Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UX Reliability] Use new modal in BaseReportActionContextMenu #56606

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BartoszGrajdek
Copy link
Contributor

@BartoszGrajdek BartoszGrajdek commented Feb 10, 2025

Explanation of Change

We've decided to refactor the react-native-bottom-modal code so that it utilizes react-native-reanimated, our goal was to improve FPS, remove the outdated library and gradually switch to the new solution. This PR enables the new solution in BaseReportActionContextMenu.

Fixed Issues

$ #49354

Tests

I think testing should go like this:

  1. Open the modal.
  2. Close it by clicking the backdrop.
  3. Open the modal.
  4. Close it through the "back" button if it exists on your device.
  5. Open the modal.
  6. Go through each button/option in that modal and verify that everything's functioning properly.

To open the modal you need to:

  1. Open any chat
  2. Send a message
  3. Long-press on the message you've sent

Offline tests

Same as above, but it shouldn't matter

QA Steps

Same as above

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android.-.mWeb.mov
iOS: Native
iOS.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS.-.mWeb.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@BartoszGrajdek BartoszGrajdek marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2025 13:57
@BartoszGrajdek BartoszGrajdek requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 13:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from shawnborton and ZhenjaHorbach and removed request for a team March 4, 2025 13:57
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 4, 2025

@shawnborton @ZhenjaHorbach One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach I'll be handling this PR, so if anything comes up, please let me know!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the popover launches in the wrong spot on web for a split second:
CleanShot 2025-03-04 at 16 13 44@2x

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 4, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screenrecorder-2025-03-29-08-46-01-658.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screenrecorder-2025-03-29-08-50-23-240.mp4
iOS: Native
2025-03-29.08.55.40.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
2025-03-29.08.55.37.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the popover launches in the wrong spot on web for a split second: CleanShot 2025-03-04 at 16 13 44@2x

Confirm !
I also sometimes have this bug

Снимок экрана 2025-03-04 в 16 46 44

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Also looks like a bug
That we have animation after changing the size of the modal

2025-03-04.16.54.42.mov

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 4, 2025

On Ios-web and Android-web I have a mini context menu

Снимок экрана 2025-03-04 в 17 02 05

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

I'll come back to this later this week or next week as I have projects with higher priority, sorry!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Any update here?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

I suppose we will continue to work on this soon !

#49354 (comment)

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the popover launches in the wrong spot on web for a split second: CleanShot 2025-03-04 at 16 13 44@2x

Confirm ! I also sometimes have this bug

Снимок экрана 2025-03-04 в 16 46 44

@ZhenjaHorbach Could you retest? I can't reproduce this

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Also looks like a bug That we have animation after changing the size of the modal

2025-03-04.16.54.42.mov

Same with this, looks like it works correct now @ZhenjaHorbach

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Sure !
I will recheck soon !

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

On Ios-web and Android-web I have a mini context menu

@ZhenjaHorbach Should be fixed as well

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

blazejkustra commented Mar 28, 2025

Bear in mind that we are only migrating modals of type bottom_docked:
CleanShot 2025-03-28 at 15 35 16

Popovers shouldn't be affected at all:
CleanShot 2025-03-28 at 15 35 42

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 28, 2025

Remove unused import from BaseReportActionContextMenu

Actually this issue is similar to this

#58705

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

Checked my old videos
And notice that we don't have a closing animation now

2025-03-28.17.38.30.mov

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

And notice that we don't have a closing animation now

Hmm interesting, that's definitely a blocker. I'm going to look at it on Monday!

Any other bugs/issues? @ZhenjaHorbach

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 28, 2025

And notice that we don't have a closing animation now

Hmm interesting, that's definitely a blocker. I'm going to look at it on Monday!

Any other bugs/issues? @ZhenjaHorbach

No

Otherwise everything is good !

And If you have 5 minutes
Could you please try to reproduce on your simulator to make sure ?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 28, 2025

And interesting
Even animationOutTiming is not working

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

And interesting Even animationOutTiming is not working

It was working — the issue was that the content was disappearing and the modal was shrinking in a weird way. It should work now after the last two commits.

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

You can check again, this time it should work well on all platforms, I'm logging off. Have fun! 😄

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 28, 2025

You are fast 😅
And yes
It works
Thanks for fix !

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

That's what I do for a living 🏃‍♂️💨

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny
Could you please help with adhoc builds here to make sure that everything works good ?

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

But on the other hand, I think everything will be fine in adhoc builds
The only thing that confuses me is the delay when changing the color of the status bar
But the same issue is in staging

2025-03-28.18.31.42.mov

Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test app build. You can view the workflow run here.

Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
Android 🤖🔄 iOS 🍎🔄
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/56606-hybrid/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/56606-hybrid/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/56606/NewExpensify.dmg https://56606.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM !

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

But wait
On real device notice this
And this is not reproduced in simulators

2025-03-29.09.08.12.mp4

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra can you please check that out? Thanks!

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Is this iOS? What browser are you using?@ZhenjaHorbach

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.16.Pro.-.2025-03-31.at.14.42.52.mp4

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

seems like normal safari to me

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 31, 2025

Yes
It's a default safari !

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

I can’t reproduce it 😢

Could you write out the detailed steps? I want to make sure I’m doing it the same way. Also, could you let me know which iPhone model you’re using, the iOS version, and the version of Safari? That’ll help a lot—thanks! @ZhenjaHorbach

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 31, 2025

I can’t reproduce it 😢

Could you write out the detailed steps? I want to make sure I’m doing it the same way. Also, could you let me know which iPhone model you’re using, the iOS version, and the version of Safari? That’ll help a lot—thanks! @ZhenjaHorbach

Hmmm, good question.
Could you try using a video message for testing?

First, tap on the input.
Then, hold down the video to open a modal.
Next, tap outside the modal window to close it.
Repeat this several times.

I just tested it, and it works for me!

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

I just tested it, and it works for me!

Wait - you mean it doesn't work for you when following these steps, right? 😆

First, tap on the input.
Then, hold down the video to open a modal.
Next, tap outside the modal window to close it.
Repeat this several times.

Still no luck, tried several times:

ScreenRecording_03-31-2025.17-05-38_1.MP4

could you let me know which iPhone model you’re using, the iOS version, and the version of Safari?

@ZhenjaHorbach bump 😄

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Can you try? 😂 56606.pr-testing.expensify.com

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 31, 2025

Wait - you mean it doesn't work for you when following these steps, right?

It reproduces stably for me following these steps 😅

could you let me know which iPhone model you’re using, the iOS version, and the version of Safari?

Oh
Sorry
I have iPhone 13 18.3.1 (18.4 - the same issue)

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented Mar 31, 2025

By the way, I also have Chrome on my iPhone
I can also reproduce

And I can reproduce with any message

2025-03-31.18.25.35.mp4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants