Skip to content

Chunk carries OSProc #213

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
jpsamaroo opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #218
Closed

Chunk carries OSProc #213

jpsamaroo opened this issue May 12, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #218
Labels
bug data movement

Comments

@jpsamaroo
Copy link
Member

This should never happen; instead we should pass just the worker ID, and use a getter to access the processor from a Chunk.
@jpsamaroo
Copy link
Member Author

Alternatively, maybe the best option is to not store such extensive state in OSProc at all; we could store processor hierarchies in a global and use children(::OSProc) to access it. This would simplify some logic which tries to avoid serializing OSProc entries.

@jpsamaroo jpsamaroo mentioned this issue May 21, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug data movement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Simplify OSProc JuliaParallel/Dagger.jl
1 participant
@jpsamaroo