Skip to content

Reconsider PR #2268 with regards to the use of relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps #2295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
otsakir opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Reconsider PR #2268 with regards to the use of relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps #2295

otsakir opened this issue Jun 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@otsakir
Milestone
Orestis Sprint 6

Comments

@otsakir
Copy link
Contributor

otsakir commented Jun 29, 2017

Existing PR needs to be reviewed after employing the strategy of relative URLs when creating RVD apps and relying on configuration to determine RVD location.
@otsakir otsakir added this to the Orestis Sprint 6 milestone Jun 29, 2017
@otsakir otsakir self-assigned this Jun 29, 2017
@otsakir otsakir changed the title Review PR #2268 with regards to use relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps Review PR #2268 with regards to the use of relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps Jun 29, 2017
@otsakir otsakir changed the title Review PR #2268 with regards to the use of relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps Reconsider PR #2268 with regards to the use of relative rcmlUrl for RVD apps Jun 29, 2017
@otsakir
Copy link
Contributor Author

otsakir commented Jun 29, 2017

Everything seems in place to accommodate for a mechanism for dynamic RVD resolution. It will be built on top of this PR.

@otsakir otsakir closed this as completed Jun 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@otsakir otsakir

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Orestis Sprint 6
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@otsakir