You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not long ago we implemented an util class. Basically, this is a class that contains all util methods required by test classes. The problem is that sometimes this class is not generated, which leads to compilation failure for test classes that use some methods from util class.
To Reproduce
This bug only happens when there is no test class that already exists for our class under test.
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Open some class, let's say class A.
Make sure that tests on this class will need util methods (example of such class is org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields).
Make sure that no test class for our class A already exists (no class ATest).
Make sure that no util class already exists in any of the test source roots of the current module (no class org.utbot.runtime.utils.UtUtils).
Run test generation.
As a result, you should get a test class that imports and uses some methods of util class UtUtils, but UtUtils would not exist, because we failed to generate it.
Expected behavior
When test class needs util class, but util class does not yet exist, an util class UtUtils should be generated.
Actual behavior
Test class that uses UtUtils is generated, but class UtUtils is not.
Visual proofs (screenshots, logs, images)
When generating tests for org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields:
The cause seems to be this exception:
It seems that when we attempt to reformat the test class, the thread we are doing it in stops due to this exception, which leads to all the further actions (like util class generation) to be skipped.
NOTE that when the test class already exists (so we rewrite it with a new one), this exception is not thrown and util class is generated successfully.
Environment
This bug happens in IntelliJ plugin. Steps to reproduce it are given above.
Additional context
Class org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields should be enough to test this bug. But if you want to check the behavior on other classes, then tests on your classes should need util class. For that purpose write methods that depend on some private fields or private classes so that we will have to use util class in order to work with them via reflection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Not long ago we implemented an util class. Basically, this is a class that contains all util methods required by test classes. The problem is that sometimes this class is not generated, which leads to compilation failure for test classes that use some methods from util class.
To Reproduce
This bug only happens when there is no test class that already exists for our class under test.
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
A
.org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields
).A
already exists (no classATest
).org.utbot.runtime.utils.UtUtils
).UtUtils
, butUtUtils
would not exist, because we failed to generate it.Expected behavior
When test class needs util class, but util class does not yet exist, an util class
UtUtils
should be generated.Actual behavior
Test class that uses
UtUtils
is generated, but classUtUtils
is not.Visual proofs (screenshots, logs, images)
When generating tests for

org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields
:The cause seems to be this exception:

It seems that when we attempt to reformat the test class, the thread we are doing it in stops due to this exception, which leads to all the further actions (like util class generation) to be skipped.
NOTE that when the test class already exists (so we rewrite it with a new one), this exception is not thrown and util class is generated successfully.
Environment
This bug happens in IntelliJ plugin. Steps to reproduce it are given above.
Additional context
Class
org.utbot.examples.objects.PrivateFields
should be enough to test this bug. But if you want to check the behavior on other classes, then tests on your classes should need util class. For that purpose write methods that depend on some private fields or private classes so that we will have to use util class in order to work with them via reflection.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: