You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.
I'm on the Mac. With spell-check, I am not using system dictionaries, but a bunch of hunspell dictionaries. Each hunspell dictionary (.aff and .dic) comes with a so-called "personal" dictionary for each locale, i.e. list of exceptions (simple text file, one word per line, no flags etc.).
These dictionaries are ignored by spell-check in Atom even though they work in hunspell from the command line. I wonder if this is a bug or a feature.
Many thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not using the personal libraries from Hunspell appears to be something of a design decision on node-spellchecker, probably because it uses different libraries on Macs. It used to only use the built-in Mac spellchecker library until recently (a year ago?) when I added the ability to use Hunspell with a setting. However, even then (and on Linux), the personal libraries are not checked.
I'm going to close this. If you want to re-open it again, feel free, but I think it may be something better suited to put on node-spellcheck first. Thank you.
Hi!
I'm on the Mac. With spell-check, I am not using system dictionaries, but a bunch of hunspell dictionaries. Each hunspell dictionary (.aff and .dic) comes with a so-called "personal" dictionary for each locale, i.e. list of exceptions (simple text file, one word per line, no flags etc.).
These dictionaries are ignored by spell-check in Atom even though they work in hunspell from the command line. I wonder if this is a bug or a feature.
Many thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: