Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Running Claude Sonnet V2 by Google VertexAI #5995

Open
1 task done
rmuilwijk opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

[Enhancement]: Running Claude Sonnet V2 by Google VertexAI #5995

rmuilwijk opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
✨ enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rmuilwijk
Copy link

What features would you like to see added?

Currently when running Claude Sonnet V2 by google vertex will create a default google genai client instead of the anthropic vertexai sdk. This does not allow you use function calls etc. Also there is no notion of token limits etc. which need to be configured to run the model.

More details

https://docs.anthropic.com/en/api/claude-on-vertex-ai

Which components are impacted by your request?

Endpoints

Pictures

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@rmuilwijk rmuilwijk added the ✨ enhancement New feature or request label Feb 24, 2025
@Hashiraee
Copy link

I’d also very much want this.

@danny-avila danny-avila marked this as a duplicate of #6183 Mar 5, 2025
@kartikay-bagla
Copy link

@danny-avila I am interested in working on this feature.

From my understanding, I can get started with modifying the publisher const in GoogleClient.js to use anthropic and see if the claude models work. Once I can confirm that only changing the publisher value is enough, we can discuss how to enable this in user config when specify models. We can also try to support other publishers on VertexAI through this.

Any ideas on how we can get the user config to support different publishers and models?

Also, just confirming that there isn't anyone else working on this issue to avoid duplicate work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✨ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants