diff --git a/RELEASE.md b/RELEASE.md
index cd4ad0b31..2110ae48c 100644
--- a/RELEASE.md
+++ b/RELEASE.md
@@ -1,4 +1,46 @@
## Devfile Release
-Our current process is documented in
-[Devfile Versioning and Release Process](docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md).
\ No newline at end of file
+### Release Process
+The current process can be found here:
+
+[Devfile Versioning and Release Process](docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md).
+
+### Levels of Support
+
+Devfile releases are considered **_stable_** even though the JSON schema is derived from an **_alpha_** version
+of the K8s API which is under development and managed by the `devworkspace` team.
+
+
+This means the scope of support will only apply to the subset of APIs that are part of the Devfile spec.
+
+The following table summarizes the versioning relationship of a Devfile release and it's corresponding components:
+
+
+| Components/Versions of a Devfile Release | Description| Release Stage |
+| :--- | :--- |:--- |
+| [K8s API](docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md#kubernetes-api) | The `devworkspace` API that Devfiles is based upon. It is independently versioned from the Devfile release.
`e.g. K8s API, v1alpha2 is part of the Devfile 2.1.0 release` | alpha
+| [JSON Schema](docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md#devfile-json-schema) | The Devfile JSON structure that is generated from the K8s API. The version is in sync with the Devfiles release.
`e.g. JSON schema v2.1.0 is part of the Devfile 2.1.0 release` |stable
+| API release version | This is the software release version of the K8s API. Similar to the JSON schema, this version is also in sync with the Devfile release.
`e.g. K8s API v1alpha2 version 2.1.0 is part of the Devfile 2.1.0 release`| stable |
+
+### Decoupling the API Release Version (Future Consideration)
+
+Currently, our JSON Schema and API releases are kept in sync with the Devfile version, but we could run in a situation
+where we would need to branch off a separate API release and maintain out of sync versions that can be delivered within
+a Devile release or outside of one.
+
+This scenario can happen when we introduce breaking API changes that would impact our consumers while continuing to
+maintain backward compatibility with the schema.
+
+We discussed the following approach in a team meeting, and it's documented here in case we ever need to take action:
+
+1. The **main** branch will continue to be the branch for active development. If there is a breaking API change, then
+we would create a new API release branch and bump up the major version.
+2. There's the potential for dual maintenance if we are working towards a major release and find a breaking API change
+in the current release. We would then create a new API branch to work on the fix and then deliver the changes back to **main**.
+3. Since dev is done on the **main** branch, consumers will run into a known versioning bug:
+[Incorrect api version is generated from "go get github.com/devfile/api/v2@main"](https://github.com/devfile/api/issues/599).
+which will cause interim, unreleased versions to incorrectly appear as `v2xxx` rather than the latest `vNext` API version.
+We will need to document this limitation and make it clear that even though the versioning is incorrect,
+they are getting the latest code.
+
+
diff --git a/docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md b/docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md
index 613782e2f..9184a568b 100644
--- a/docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md
+++ b/docs/proposals/versioning-and-release.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Devfile Versioning and Release Process
This document outlines the versioning and release process for the Devfile spec.
-##Reference
+## Reference
This process summarizes parts from the Devfile API technical meeting slides presented by @davidfestal back in October, and I recommend having a read through of it: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ohM1HzPB59a3ajvB7rVWJkKONLBAuT0mb5P20_A6vLs/edit#slide=id.g8fc722bef9_1_8
## Versioning