Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix: Improve Safety and Reliability in AnnotationProcessorContext Initialization #3

Open
Manas-Dikshit opened this issue Mar 9, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Manas-Dikshit
Copy link

The current implementation of AnnotationProcessorContext has potential stability and compatibility issues due to improper handling of unwrapping and initialization. This issue aims to fix these problems and introduce enhancements for better maintainability.

🔴 Issues Identified:
🔄 Unwrapping with Reflection (jbUnwrap) Can Fail Silently:

The method jbUnwrap() attempts to unwrap ProcessingEnvironment using reflection, but swallows all exceptions (Throwable ignored).
If unwrap() fails, it returns null or the original wrapper, leading to potential ClassCastException later.
Fix: Log an error message when unwrapping fails instead of ignoring the exception.
🚨 Possible NullPointerException in fromProcessingEnvironment():

javacTrees, treeMaker, names, and trees are not explicitly checked for null values after assignment.
If JavacProcessingEnvironment changes in newer JDK versions, this may break.
Fix: Add null checks and fail-fast behavior with an exception or meaningful logging.
📌 Improve equals() and hashCode():

equals() does not compare javacProcessingEnvironment, which might cause unexpected behavior.
hashCode() should also include javacProcessingEnvironment for consistency.
Fix: Include javacProcessingEnvironment in both methods.
📝 Add Debug Logging for Context Creation:

Currently, there’s no visibility into the context initialization process.
Enhancement: Add DEBUG logs for each step when constructing AnnotationProcessorContext.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant