From e0ab45afb71c46f4fab5fa4576a3d0091146acd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Van de Sande Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:09:18 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Adding co-author When Vitalik initially proposed the idea it was quite different, using the binary form of the address, which added complexity. I created the first implementation in that form, and suggested the simplified version `If it's 8 or upper (including a-f) then it should be uppercase, otherwise, it should be lowercase.` I also pushed the first implementations. His original post has been edited by EIP editors as we didn't have the PR format yet. Would that be enough to be a co-author? I don't mind if this is rejected, just wanted to point that up. --- EIPS/eip-55.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/EIPS/eip-55.md b/EIPS/eip-55.md index caab54a64acd30..92f4cea57950a0 100644 --- a/EIPS/eip-55.md +++ b/EIPS/eip-55.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- eip: 55 title: Mixed-case checksum address encoding -author: Vitalik Buterin +author: Vitalik Buterin , Alex Van de Sande type: Standards Track category: ERC status: Accepted