We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PG has a bunch of versions of Shakespeare's plays, the earlier of which are not really presentable. And other outliers.
For example, Much ado about nothing is:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1519 (not bad at all) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2240 (horrible) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1520 (horrible) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1118 (not the worst) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2252 (horrible) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1783 (horrible)
there are catalog notes saying that 1519 is an "improved" version.
quick search shows them all. As part of a UI redesign, we could do things like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
PG has a bunch of versions of Shakespeare's plays, the earlier of which are not really presentable. And other outliers.
For example, Much ado about nothing is:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1519 (not bad at all)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2240 (horrible)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1520 (horrible)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1118 (not the worst)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2252 (horrible)
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1783 (horrible)
there are catalog notes saying that 1519 is an "improved" version.
quick search shows them all.
As part of a UI redesign, we could do things like
one step we could take in this path is to create a type : obsolete
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: