Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧹 Clarification: Scopes section could be improved #1566

Open
gregsdennis opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #1588
Open

🧹 Clarification: Scopes section could be improved #1566

gregsdennis opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #1588
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@gregsdennis
Copy link
Member

Specification section

Core section on lexical and dynamic scopes

What is unclear?

This section isn't wrong, but it is quite confusing. We need to rewrite this.

Proposal

Not currently.

This is follow-on work from #1555

Do you think this work might require an [Architectural Decision Record (ADR)]? (significant or noteworthy)

No

@ash2228
Copy link

ash2228 commented Dec 2, 2024

/assign

@gregsdennis
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @ash2228, but the TSC have been discussing this for a while and we have specific improvements that we'd like to make. We'll handle this one.

@29deepanshutyagi
Copy link

i want to work on this issue , kindly assign me @gregsdennis

@gregsdennis
Copy link
Member Author

@29deepanshutyagi please read my comment above.

@aryangasni
Copy link

Hi @gregsdennis,
What is TSC?

@gregsdennis
Copy link
Member Author

We're the Technical Steering Committee. We are tasked with making the big decisions for the project.

@gregsdennis gregsdennis linked a pull request Feb 25, 2025 that will close this issue
@gregsdennis gregsdennis self-assigned this Feb 25, 2025
@gregsdennis gregsdennis moved this from Awaiting PR to In Progress in Stable Release Development Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants