You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a package which follows Material UI versions (e.g., @mui/material, @mui/utils, @mui/system) was skipped in a previous release (because it had no changes) and has to be bumped in the next release (because now it has changes), the script should propose the root's package.json version for it
For example, if @mui/utils last release was 1.0.0 and the next Material UI version is 1.0.2, the script should propose 1.0.2 instead of 1.0.1.
@Janpot I've created this issue to collect improvements we've discussed about the version bump script. I'll leave it up to you and the @mui/code-infra team to prioritize it.
When a package which follows Material UI versions (e.g., @mui/material, @mui/utils, @mui/system) was skipped in a previous release (because it had no changes) and has to be bumped in the next release (because now it has changes), the script should propose the root's package.json version for it
But we explicitly want independent versioning. Why does it only have to catch up with latest version once there is a change. i.e. In your example: why is it ok for @mui/[email protected] to depend on @mui/[email protected] but it's not ok for @mui/[email protected] to depend on @mui/[email protected]? We either do independent versioning or we don't, I don't really see the benefit of creating a hybrid.
An issue to collect improvements we need for the version bump script (
release:version
)alpha
tobeta
) the script should bump all packages regardless of whether they have changes or not.@mui/material
,@mui/utils
,@mui/system
) was skipped in a previous release (because it had no changes) and has to be bumped in the next release (because now it has changes), the script should propose the root's package.json version for it@mui/utils
last release was1.0.0
and the next Material UI version is1.0.2
, the script should propose1.0.2
instead of1.0.1
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: