You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: doc/tsc-meetings/io.js/2015-03-04.md
+3-3
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -117,17 +117,17 @@ Discussion of how we should probably just add more Buffer methods to core.
117
117
118
118
Bert: there’s another aspect of this. At some point Node was really modern, but we’ve fallen behind. We can’t even get HTTP/2 or web sockets, we’re in trouble.
119
119
120
-
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to user-land code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
120
+
Domenic: we’ve learned a lot over the last few years that pushes us to userland code instead of in core. But we need to have some things be “official.”
121
121
122
122
Trevor: I would like the infrastructure for HTTP/2 to be similar to HTTP/1, with http-parser etc.
123
123
124
124
Ben: is there any reason HTTP/2 couldn’t be done in pure JS?
125
125
126
126
Discussion of http-parser and current HTTP/1 implementation strategy and speed.
127
127
128
-
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some user-land ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
128
+
Bert: I think as a TC what we should say is “we would like to support HTTP/2, but want to see some userland ideas first.” We don’t need to actually start implementation progress right now.
129
129
130
-
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a user-land HTTP/2 module?
130
+
Ben: does anyone on the TC want to write a userland HTTP/2 module?
131
131
132
132
Discussion of how Fedor already has a SPDY implementation.
0 commit comments