You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, it seems wrong to me. Doesn't it actually output numbers from 13 to 0? Or should the definition line mean numbers smaller than 14 and greater or equal to 0? See the following enumeration for the first iteration:
a !b a g g g g g o! fuck
(7 - 8 + 7 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1) * 2
That seems like 13 to me.
But it could be that I'm getting wrong the meaning of g because the use in my example is g - 10^-x ie added to the current value, the amount of uninterrupted g instructions determines the x. From the definition in the README (g - 10^-x ie added to the current value, the amount of the next g instructions determines the x), I would understand g in the example is always either 1 or one 10^-5. But both of these make even less sense than the one I am using.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The README claims the following:
However, it seems wrong to me. Doesn't it actually output numbers from 13 to 0? Or should the definition line mean numbers smaller than 14 and greater or equal to 0? See the following enumeration for the first iteration:
That seems like 13 to me.
But it could be that I'm getting wrong the meaning of
g
because the use in my example isg - 10^-x ie added to the current value, the amount of uninterrupted g instructions determines the x
. From the definition in the README (g - 10^-x ie added to the current value, the amount of the next g instructions determines the x
), I would understandg
in the example is always either1
or one10^-5
. But both of these make even less sense than the one I am using.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: