Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test alternative RocksDB backend @nxtedition/rocksdb #164

Closed
jacoscaz opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #165
Closed

Test alternative RocksDB backend @nxtedition/rocksdb #164

jacoscaz opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #165

Comments

@jacoscaz
Copy link
Collaborator

The backend/rocksdb-nxtedition branch adds preliminary support for the alternative RocksDB backend @nxtedition/rocksdb built by @ronag, which passes all of our tests and appears to be roughly 30% faster than classic-level. If confirmed, that would be a very significant performance improvement at basically no cost but swapping backends.
@jacoscaz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discovered while perusing through Level/community#121 .

@jacoscaz jacoscaz mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2024
Merged
@jacoscaz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

After more testing, gains are between 10% and 20%. Still, nothing to complain about!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

backend: @nxtedition/rocksdb quadstorejs/quadstore
1 participant
@jacoscaz