You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Who is this for and what problem do they have today?
Redpanda users relying on mTLS authentication, especially those using SPIFFE-based identities. Redpanda only supports Distinguished Name (DN) for mTLS, but SPIFFE omits DN, making Redpanda incompatible. This forces users to:
Use weaker authentication methods
Implement complex workarounds
Build custom authentication proxies
Avoid Redpanda for security-critical workloads
What are the success criteria?
Support SAN URI authentication alongside DN
Maintain backward compatibility
No required changes for existing deployments (opt-in)
Clear documentation and integration tests
No performance impact
Why is solving this problem impactful?
For users:
Enables Redpanda in SPIFFE-secured environments
Simplifies authentication without workarounds
Aligns security with Kafka and cloud-native standards
For Redpanda:
Expands adoption in security-critical industries
Enhances SPIFFE and cloud integration
Addresses a key limitation vs. Apache Kafka
Additional notes
Implementation:
Utilize existing get_alt_name_information for SAN URI retrieval
Hybrid authentication (DN + SAN URI) with per-certificate config
#25333
Who is this for and what problem do they have today?
Redpanda users relying on mTLS authentication, especially those using SPIFFE-based identities. Redpanda only supports Distinguished Name (DN) for mTLS, but SPIFFE omits DN, making Redpanda incompatible. This forces users to:
What are the success criteria?
Why is solving this problem impactful?
For users:
For Redpanda:
Additional notes
Implementation:
References:
JIRA Link: CORE-9817
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: