Skip to content

Commit cb834c3

Browse files
renovate[bot]Josh-Walker-GM
authored andcommitted
chore(deps): update ossf/scorecard-action action to v2.4.0 (#11485)
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [ossf/scorecard-action](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action) | action | minor | `v2.3.1` -> `v2.4.0` | --- > [!WARNING] > Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information. --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>ossf/scorecard-action (ossf/scorecard-action)</summary> ### [`v2.4.0`](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/releases/tag/v2.4.0) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/compare/v2.3.3...v2.4.0) #### What's Changed This update bumps the Scorecard version to the v5 release. For a complete list of changes, please refer to the [v5.0.0 release notes](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard/releases/tag/v5.0.0). Of special note to Scorecard Action is the Maintainer Annotation feature, which can be used to suppress some Code Scanning false positives. Alerts will not be generated for any Scorecard Check with an annotation. - 🌱 Bump github.com/ossf/scorecard/v5 from v5.0.0-rc2 to v5.0.0 by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1410](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1410) - 🐛 lower license sarif alert threshold to 9 by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1411](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1411) ##### Documentation - docs: dogfooding badge by [@&#8203;jkowalleck](https://redirect.github.com/jkowalleck) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1399](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1399) #### New Contributors - [@&#8203;jkowalleck](https://redirect.github.com/jkowalleck) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1399](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1399) **Full Changelog**: ossf/scorecard-action@v2.3.3...v2.4.0 ### [`v2.3.3`](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/releases/tag/v2.3.3) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/compare/v2.3.2...v2.3.3) > \[!NOTE]\ > There is no v2.3.2 release as a step was skipped in the release process. This was fixed and re-released under the v2.3.3 tag #### What's Changed - 🌱 Bump github.com/ossf/scorecard/v4 (v4.13.1) to github.com/ossf/scorecard/v5 (v5.0.0-rc1) by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1366](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1366) - 🌱 Bump github.com/ossf/scorecard/v5 from v5.0.0-rc1 to v5.0.0-rc2 by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1374](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1374) - 🌱 Bump github.com/ossf/scorecard/v5 from v5.0.0-rc2 to v5.0.0-rc2.0.20240509182734-7ce860946928 by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1377](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1377) For a full changelist of what these include, see the [v5.0.0-rc1](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard/releases/tag/v5.0.0-rc1) and [v5.0.0-rc2](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard/releases/tag/v5.0.0-rc2) release notes. ##### Documentation - 📖 Move token discussion out of main README. by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1279](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1279) - 📖 link to `ossf/scorecard` workflow instead of maintaining an example by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1352](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1352) - 📖 update api links to new scorecard.dev site by [@&#8203;spencerschrock](https://redirect.github.com/spencerschrock) in [https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1376](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/pull/1376) **Full Changelog**: ossf/scorecard-action@v2.3.1...v2.3.3 ### [`v2.3.2`](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/compare/v2.3.1...v2.3.2) [Compare Source](https://redirect.github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/compare/v2.3.1...v2.3.2) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Enabled. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/). View the [repository job log](https://developer.mend.io/github/redwoodjs/redwood). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOC41OS4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzguNTkuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4iLCJsYWJlbHMiOltdfQ==--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 parent 32c6390 commit cb834c3

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

Diff for: .github/workflows/scorecard.yml

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ jobs:
3737
persist-credentials: false
3838

3939
- name: 'Run analysis'
40-
uses: ossf/scorecard-action@0864cf19026789058feabb7e87baa5f140aac736 # v2.3.1
40+
uses: ossf/scorecard-action@62b2cac7ed8198b15735ed49ab1e5cf35480ba46 # v2.4.0
4141
with:
4242
results_file: results.sarif
4343
results_format: sarif

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)