Skip to content
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.

Commit 97b4461

Browse files
committedMar 23, 2024·
Auto merge of rust-lang#121557 - RalfJung:const-fn-call-promotion, r=<try>
restrict promotion of `const fn` calls We only promote them in `const`/`static` initializers, but even that is still unfortunate -- we still cannot add promoteds to required_consts. But we should add them there to make sure it's always okay to evaluate every const we encounter in a MIR body. That effort of not promoting things that can fail to evaluate is tracked in rust-lang#80619. These `const fn` calls are the last missing piece. So I propose that we do not promote const-fn calls in const when that may fail without the entire const failing, thereby completing rust-lang#80619. Unfortunately we can't just reject promoting these functions outright due to backwards compatibility. So let's see if we can find a hack that makes crater happy... For the record, this is the [crater analysis](rust-lang#80243 (comment)) from when I tried to entirely forbid this kind of promotion. It's a tiny amount of breakage and if we had a nice alternative for code like that, we could conceivably push it through... but sadly, inline const expressions are still blocked on t-lang concerns about post-monomorphization errors and we haven't yet figured out an implementation that can resolve those concerns. So we're forced to make progress via other means, such as terrible hacks like this. Attempt one: only promote calls on the "safe path" at the beginning of a MIR block. This is the path that starts at the start block and continues via gotos and calls, but stops at the first branch. If we had imposed this restriction before stabilizing `if` and `match` in `const`, this would have definitely been sufficient... EDIT: Turns out that works. :) **Here's the t-lang [nomination comment](rust-lang#121557 (comment) And here's the [FCP comment](rust-lang#121557 (comment)). r? `@oli-obk`
2 parents c3b05c6 + 85433c4 commit 97b4461

20 files changed

+343
-295
lines changed
 

‎compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/dummy_machine.rs

+3
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir> interpret::Machine<'mir, 'tcx> for DummyMachine {
4646
type MemoryKind = !;
4747
const PANIC_ON_ALLOC_FAIL: bool = true;
4848

49+
// We want to just eval random consts in the program, so `eval_mir_const` can fail.
50+
const ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED: bool = false;
51+
4952
#[inline(always)]
5053
fn enforce_alignment(_ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool {
5154
false // no reason to enforce alignment

‎compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/eval_context.rs

+11-11
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -822,15 +822,13 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
822822
self.stack_mut().push(frame);
823823

824824
// Make sure all the constants required by this frame evaluate successfully (post-monomorphization check).
825-
if M::POST_MONO_CHECKS {
826-
for &const_ in &body.required_consts {
827-
let c = self
828-
.instantiate_from_current_frame_and_normalize_erasing_regions(const_.const_)?;
829-
c.eval(*self.tcx, self.param_env, const_.span).map_err(|err| {
830-
err.emit_note(*self.tcx);
831-
err
832-
})?;
833-
}
825+
for &const_ in &body.required_consts {
826+
let c =
827+
self.instantiate_from_current_frame_and_normalize_erasing_regions(const_.const_)?;
828+
c.eval(*self.tcx, self.param_env, const_.span).map_err(|err| {
829+
err.emit_note(*self.tcx);
830+
err
831+
})?;
834832
}
835833

836834
// done
@@ -1179,8 +1177,10 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
11791177
) -> InterpResult<'tcx, OpTy<'tcx, M::Provenance>> {
11801178
M::eval_mir_constant(self, *val, span, layout, |ecx, val, span, layout| {
11811179
let const_val = val.eval(*ecx.tcx, ecx.param_env, span).map_err(|err| {
1182-
// FIXME: somehow this is reachable even when POST_MONO_CHECKS is on.
1183-
// Are we not always populating `required_consts`?
1180+
if M::ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED && !matches!(err, ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(..)) {
1181+
// Looks like the const is not captued by `required_consts`, that's bad.
1182+
bug!("interpret const eval failure of {val:?} which is not in required_consts");
1183+
}
11841184
err.emit_note(*ecx.tcx);
11851185
err
11861186
})?;

‎compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/machine.rs

+3-2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -140,8 +140,9 @@ pub trait Machine<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir>: Sized {
140140
/// Should the machine panic on allocation failures?
141141
const PANIC_ON_ALLOC_FAIL: bool;
142142

143-
/// Should post-monomorphization checks be run when a stack frame is pushed?
144-
const POST_MONO_CHECKS: bool = true;
143+
/// Determines whether `eval_mir_constant` can never fail because all required consts have
144+
/// already been checked before.
145+
const ALL_CONSTS_ARE_PRECHECKED: bool = true;
145146

146147
/// Whether memory accesses should be alignment-checked.
147148
fn enforce_alignment(ecx: &InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, Self>) -> bool;

‎compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/consts.rs

+14
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -238,6 +238,20 @@ impl<'tcx> Const<'tcx> {
238238
}
239239
}
240240

241+
/// Determines whether we need to add this const to `required_consts`. This is the case if and
242+
/// only if evaluating it may error.
243+
#[inline]
244+
pub fn is_required_const(&self) -> bool {
245+
match self {
246+
Const::Ty(c) => match c.kind() {
247+
ty::ConstKind::Value(_) => false, // already a value, cannot error
248+
_ => true,
249+
},
250+
Const::Val(..) => false, // already a value, cannot error
251+
Const::Unevaluated(..) => true,
252+
}
253+
}
254+
241255
#[inline]
242256
pub fn try_to_scalar(self) -> Option<Scalar> {
243257
match self {

‎compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/inline.rs

+9-14
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -706,18 +706,12 @@ impl<'tcx> Inliner<'tcx> {
706706
kind: TerminatorKind::Goto { target: integrator.map_block(START_BLOCK) },
707707
});
708708

709-
// Copy only unevaluated constants from the callee_body into the caller_body.
710-
// Although we are only pushing `ConstKind::Unevaluated` consts to
711-
// `required_consts`, here we may not only have `ConstKind::Unevaluated`
712-
// because we are calling `instantiate_and_normalize_erasing_regions`.
713-
caller_body.required_consts.extend(callee_body.required_consts.iter().copied().filter(
714-
|&ct| match ct.const_ {
715-
Const::Ty(_) => {
716-
bug!("should never encounter ty::UnevaluatedConst in `required_consts`")
717-
}
718-
Const::Val(..) | Const::Unevaluated(..) => true,
719-
},
720-
));
709+
// Copy required constants from the callee_body into the caller_body. Although we are only
710+
// pushing unevaluated consts to `required_consts`, here they may have been evaluated
711+
// because we are calling `instantiate_and_normalize_erasing_regions` -- so we filter again.
712+
caller_body.required_consts.extend(
713+
callee_body.required_consts.into_iter().filter(|ct| ct.const_.is_required_const()),
714+
);
721715
// Now that we incorporated the callee's `required_consts`, we can remove the callee from
722716
// `mentioned_items` -- but we have to take their `mentioned_items` in return. This does
723717
// some extra work here to save the monomorphization collector work later. It helps a lot,
@@ -733,8 +727,9 @@ impl<'tcx> Inliner<'tcx> {
733727
caller_body.mentioned_items.remove(idx);
734728
caller_body.mentioned_items.extend(callee_body.mentioned_items);
735729
} else {
736-
// If we can't find the callee, there's no point in adding its items.
737-
// Probably it already got removed by being inlined elsewhere in the same function.
730+
// If we can't find the callee, there's no point in adding its items. Probably it
731+
// already got removed by being inlined elsewhere in the same function, so we already
732+
// took its items.
738733
}
739734
}
740735

‎compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/lib.rs

+2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ fn mir_promoted(
344344
body.tainted_by_errors = Some(error_reported);
345345
}
346346

347+
// Collect `required_consts` *before* promotion, so if there are any consts being promoted
348+
// we still add them to the list in the outer MIR body.
347349
let mut required_consts = Vec::new();
348350
let mut required_consts_visitor = RequiredConstsVisitor::new(&mut required_consts);
349351
for (bb, bb_data) in traversal::reverse_postorder(&body) {

‎compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/promote_consts.rs

+117-34
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
1313
//! move analysis runs after promotion on broken MIR.
1414
1515
use either::{Left, Right};
16+
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
1617
use rustc_hir as hir;
1718
use rustc_middle::mir;
1819
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::{MutVisitor, MutatingUseContext, PlaceContext, Visitor};
@@ -175,6 +176,12 @@ fn collect_temps_and_candidates<'tcx>(
175176
struct Validator<'a, 'tcx> {
176177
ccx: &'a ConstCx<'a, 'tcx>,
177178
temps: &'a mut IndexSlice<Local, TempState>,
179+
/// For backwards compatibility, we are promoting function calls in `const`/`static`
180+
/// initializers. But we want to avoid evaluating code that might panic and that otherwise would
181+
/// not have been evaluated, so we only promote such calls in basic blocks that are guaranteed
182+
/// to execute. In other words, we only promote such calls in basic blocks that are definitely
183+
/// not dead code. Here we cache the result of computing that set of basic blocks.
184+
promotion_safe_blocks: Option<FxHashSet<BasicBlock>>,
178185
}
179186

180187
impl<'a, 'tcx> std::ops::Deref for Validator<'a, 'tcx> {
@@ -260,7 +267,9 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
260267
self.validate_rvalue(rhs)
261268
}
262269
Right(terminator) => match &terminator.kind {
263-
TerminatorKind::Call { func, args, .. } => self.validate_call(func, args),
270+
TerminatorKind::Call { func, args, .. } => {
271+
self.validate_call(func, args, loc.block)
272+
}
264273
TerminatorKind::Yield { .. } => Err(Unpromotable),
265274
kind => {
266275
span_bug!(terminator.source_info.span, "{:?} not promotable", kind);
@@ -587,53 +596,103 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
587596
Ok(())
588597
}
589598

599+
/// Computes the sets of blocks of this MIR that are definitely going to be executed
600+
/// if the function returns successfully. That makes it safe to promote calls in them
601+
/// that might fail.
602+
fn promotion_safe_blocks(body: &mir::Body<'tcx>) -> FxHashSet<BasicBlock> {
603+
let mut safe_blocks = FxHashSet::default();
604+
let mut safe_block = START_BLOCK;
605+
loop {
606+
safe_blocks.insert(safe_block);
607+
// Let's see if we can find another safe block.
608+
safe_block = match body.basic_blocks[safe_block].terminator().kind {
609+
TerminatorKind::Goto { target } => target,
610+
TerminatorKind::Call { target: Some(target), .. }
611+
| TerminatorKind::Drop { target, .. } => {
612+
// This calls a function or the destructor. `target` does not get executed if
613+
// the callee loops or panics. But in both cases the const already fails to
614+
// evaluate, so we are fine considering `target` a safe block for promotion.
615+
target
616+
}
617+
TerminatorKind::Assert { target, .. } => {
618+
// Similar to above, we only consider successful execution.
619+
target
620+
}
621+
_ => {
622+
// No next safe block.
623+
break;
624+
}
625+
};
626+
}
627+
safe_blocks
628+
}
629+
630+
/// Returns whether the block is "safe" for promotion, which means it cannot be dead code.
631+
/// We use this to avoid promoting operations that can fail in dead code.
632+
fn is_promotion_safe_block(&mut self, block: BasicBlock) -> bool {
633+
let body = self.body;
634+
let safe_blocks =
635+
self.promotion_safe_blocks.get_or_insert_with(|| Self::promotion_safe_blocks(body));
636+
safe_blocks.contains(&block)
637+
}
638+
590639
fn validate_call(
591640
&mut self,
592641
callee: &Operand<'tcx>,
593642
args: &[Spanned<Operand<'tcx>>],
643+
block: BasicBlock,
594644
) -> Result<(), Unpromotable> {
645+
// Validate the operands. If they fail, there's no question -- we cannot promote.
646+
self.validate_operand(callee)?;
647+
for arg in args {
648+
self.validate_operand(&arg.node)?;
649+
}
650+
651+
// Functions marked `#[rustc_promotable]` are explicitly allowed to be promoted, so we can
652+
// accept them at this point.
595653
let fn_ty = callee.ty(self.body, self.tcx);
654+
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, _) = *fn_ty.kind() {
655+
if self.tcx.is_promotable_const_fn(def_id) {
656+
return Ok(());
657+
}
658+
}
596659

597-
// Inside const/static items, we promote all (eligible) function calls.
598-
// Everywhere else, we require `#[rustc_promotable]` on the callee.
599-
let promote_all_const_fn = matches!(
660+
// Ideally, we'd stop here and reject the rest.
661+
// But for backward compatibility, we have to accept some promotion in const/static
662+
// initializers. Inline consts are explicitly excluded, they are more recent so we have no
663+
// backwards compatibility reason to allow more promotion inside of them.
664+
let promote_all_fn = matches!(
600665
self.const_kind,
601666
Some(hir::ConstContext::Static(_) | hir::ConstContext::Const { inline: false })
602667
);
603-
if !promote_all_const_fn {
604-
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, _) = *fn_ty.kind() {
605-
// Never promote runtime `const fn` calls of
606-
// functions without `#[rustc_promotable]`.
607-
if !self.tcx.is_promotable_const_fn(def_id) {
608-
return Err(Unpromotable);
609-
}
610-
}
668+
if !promote_all_fn {
669+
return Err(Unpromotable);
611670
}
612-
671+
// Make sure the callee is a `const fn`.
613672
let is_const_fn = match *fn_ty.kind() {
614673
ty::FnDef(def_id, _) => self.tcx.is_const_fn_raw(def_id),
615674
_ => false,
616675
};
617676
if !is_const_fn {
618677
return Err(Unpromotable);
619678
}
620-
621-
self.validate_operand(callee)?;
622-
for arg in args {
623-
self.validate_operand(&arg.node)?;
679+
// The problem is, this may promote calls to functions that panic.
680+
// We don't want to introduce compilation errors if there's a panic in a call in dead code.
681+
// So we ensure that this is not dead code.
682+
if !self.is_promotion_safe_block(block) {
683+
return Err(Unpromotable);
624684
}
625-
685+
// This passed all checks, so let's accept.
626686
Ok(())
627687
}
628688
}
629689

630-
// FIXME(eddyb) remove the differences for promotability in `static`, `const`, `const fn`.
631690
fn validate_candidates(
632691
ccx: &ConstCx<'_, '_>,
633692
temps: &mut IndexSlice<Local, TempState>,
634693
candidates: &[Candidate],
635694
) -> Vec<Candidate> {
636-
let mut validator = Validator { ccx, temps };
695+
let mut validator = Validator { ccx, temps, promotion_safe_blocks: None };
637696

638697
candidates
639698
.iter()
@@ -652,6 +711,10 @@ struct Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
652711
/// If true, all nested temps are also kept in the
653712
/// source MIR, not moved to the promoted MIR.
654713
keep_original: bool,
714+
715+
/// If true, add the new const (the promoted) to the required_consts of the parent MIR.
716+
/// This is initially false and then set by the visitor when it encounters a `Call` terminator.
717+
add_to_required: bool,
655718
}
656719

657720
impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
@@ -754,6 +817,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
754817
TerminatorKind::Call {
755818
mut func, mut args, call_source: desugar, fn_span, ..
756819
} => {
820+
// This promoted involves a function call, so it may fail to evaluate.
821+
// Let's make sure it is added to `required_consts` so that that failure cannot get lost.
822+
self.add_to_required = true;
823+
757824
self.visit_operand(&mut func, loc);
758825
for arg in &mut args {
759826
self.visit_operand(&mut arg.node, loc);
@@ -788,7 +855,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
788855

789856
fn promote_candidate(mut self, candidate: Candidate, next_promoted_id: usize) -> Body<'tcx> {
790857
let def = self.source.source.def_id();
791-
let mut rvalue = {
858+
let (mut rvalue, promoted_op) = {
792859
let promoted = &mut self.promoted;
793860
let promoted_id = Promoted::new(next_promoted_id);
794861
let tcx = self.tcx;
@@ -798,11 +865,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
798865
let args = tcx.erase_regions(GenericArgs::identity_for_item(tcx, def));
799866
let uneval = mir::UnevaluatedConst { def, args, promoted: Some(promoted_id) };
800867

801-
Operand::Constant(Box::new(ConstOperand {
802-
span,
803-
user_ty: None,
804-
const_: Const::Unevaluated(uneval, ty),
805-
}))
868+
ConstOperand { span, user_ty: None, const_: Const::Unevaluated(uneval, ty) }
806869
};
807870

808871
let blocks = self.source.basic_blocks.as_mut();
@@ -835,22 +898,26 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
835898
let promoted_ref = local_decls.push(promoted_ref);
836899
assert_eq!(self.temps.push(TempState::Unpromotable), promoted_ref);
837900

901+
let promoted_operand = promoted_operand(ref_ty, span);
838902
let promoted_ref_statement = Statement {
839903
source_info: statement.source_info,
840904
kind: StatementKind::Assign(Box::new((
841905
Place::from(promoted_ref),
842-
Rvalue::Use(promoted_operand(ref_ty, span)),
906+
Rvalue::Use(Operand::Constant(Box::new(promoted_operand))),
843907
))),
844908
};
845909
self.extra_statements.push((loc, promoted_ref_statement));
846910

847-
Rvalue::Ref(
848-
tcx.lifetimes.re_erased,
849-
*borrow_kind,
850-
Place {
851-
local: mem::replace(&mut place.local, promoted_ref),
852-
projection: List::empty(),
853-
},
911+
(
912+
Rvalue::Ref(
913+
tcx.lifetimes.re_erased,
914+
*borrow_kind,
915+
Place {
916+
local: mem::replace(&mut place.local, promoted_ref),
917+
projection: List::empty(),
918+
},
919+
),
920+
promoted_operand,
854921
)
855922
};
856923

@@ -862,6 +929,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
862929

863930
let span = self.promoted.span;
864931
self.assign(RETURN_PLACE, rvalue, span);
932+
933+
// Now that we did promotion, we know whether we'll want to add this to `required_consts`.
934+
if self.add_to_required {
935+
self.source.required_consts.push(promoted_op);
936+
}
937+
865938
self.promoted
866939
}
867940
}
@@ -877,6 +950,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MutVisitor<'tcx> for Promoter<'a, 'tcx> {
877950
*local = self.promote_temp(*local);
878951
}
879952
}
953+
954+
fn visit_constant(&mut self, constant: &mut ConstOperand<'tcx>, _location: Location) {
955+
if constant.const_.is_required_const() {
956+
self.promoted.required_consts.push(*constant);
957+
}
958+
959+
// Skipping `super_constant` as the visitor is otherwise only looking for locals.
960+
}
880961
}
881962

882963
fn promote_candidates<'tcx>(
@@ -930,8 +1011,10 @@ fn promote_candidates<'tcx>(
9301011
temps: &mut temps,
9311012
extra_statements: &mut extra_statements,
9321013
keep_original: false,
1014+
add_to_required: false,
9331015
};
9341016

1017+
// `required_consts` of the promoted itself gets filled while building the MIR body.
9351018
let mut promoted = promoter.promote_candidate(candidate, promotions.len());
9361019
promoted.source.promoted = Some(promotions.next_index());
9371020
promotions.push(promoted);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
Please sign in to comment.