Rollup merge of #111120 - chenyukang:yukang-suggest-let, r=Nilstrieb

Suggest let for possible binding with ty

Origin from #109128 (comment)

r? `@Nilstrieb`

Author: Dylan-DPC

compiler/rustc_macros/src/diagnostics/mod.rs

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ pub fn lint_diagnostic_derive(s: Structure<'_>) -> TokenStream {
 /// ```fluent
 /// parser_expected_identifier = expected identifier
 ///
-/// parser_expected_identifier-found = expected identifier, found {$found}
+/// parser_expected_identifier_found = expected identifier, found {$found}
 ///
 /// parser_raw_identifier = escape `{$ident}` to use it as an identifier
 /// ```

compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl

@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ parse_expected_identifier = expected identifier
 parse_sugg_escape_identifier = escape `{$ident_name}` to use it as an identifier
 
 parse_sugg_remove_comma = remove this comma
+parse_sugg_add_let_for_stmt = you might have meant to introduce a new binding
 
 parse_expected_semi_found_reserved_identifier_str = expected `;`, found reserved identifier `{$token}`
 parse_expected_semi_found_keyword_str = expected `;`, found keyword `{$token}`

compiler/rustc_parse/src/errors.rs

@@ -906,6 +906,18 @@ pub(crate) struct SuggRemoveComma {
     pub span: Span,
 }
 
+#[derive(Subdiagnostic)]
+#[suggestion(
+    parse_sugg_add_let_for_stmt,
+    style = "verbose",
+    applicability = "maybe-incorrect",
+    code = "let "
+)]
+pub(crate) struct SuggAddMissingLetStmt {
+    #[primary_span]
+    pub span: Span,
+}
+
 #[derive(Subdiagnostic)]
 pub(crate) enum ExpectedIdentifierFound {
     #[label(parse_expected_identifier_found_reserved_identifier)]

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use crate::errors::{
     IncorrectUseOfAwait, ParenthesesInForHead, ParenthesesInForHeadSugg,
     PatternMethodParamWithoutBody, QuestionMarkInType, QuestionMarkInTypeSugg, SelfParamNotFirst,
     StructLiteralBodyWithoutPath, StructLiteralBodyWithoutPathSugg, StructLiteralNeedingParens,
-    StructLiteralNeedingParensSugg, SuggEscapeIdentifier, SuggRemoveComma,
+    StructLiteralNeedingParensSugg, SuggAddMissingLetStmt, SuggEscapeIdentifier, SuggRemoveComma,
     UnexpectedConstInGenericParam, UnexpectedConstParamDeclaration,
     UnexpectedConstParamDeclarationSugg, UnmatchedAngleBrackets, UseEqInstead,
 };
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ use rustc_ast::{
 use rustc_ast_pretty::pprust;
 use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
 use rustc_errors::{
-    pluralize, Applicability, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, DiagnosticMessage, ErrorGuaranteed,
-    FatalError, Handler, IntoDiagnostic, MultiSpan, PResult,
+    pluralize, AddToDiagnostic, Applicability, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, DiagnosticMessage,
+    ErrorGuaranteed, FatalError, Handler, IntoDiagnostic, MultiSpan, PResult,
 };
 use rustc_session::errors::ExprParenthesesNeeded;
 use rustc_span::source_map::Spanned;
@@ -1006,6 +1006,31 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
         Err(e)
     }
 
+    /// Suggest add the missing `let` before the identifier in stmt
+    /// `a: Ty = 1` -> `let a: Ty = 1`
+    pub(super) fn suggest_add_missing_let_for_stmt(
+        &mut self,
+        err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed>,
+    ) {
+        if self.token == token::Colon {
+            let prev_span = self.prev_token.span.shrink_to_lo();
+            let snapshot = self.create_snapshot_for_diagnostic();
+            self.bump();
+            match self.parse_ty() {
+                Ok(_) => {
+                    if self.token == token::Eq {
+                        let sugg = SuggAddMissingLetStmt { span: prev_span };
+                        sugg.add_to_diagnostic(err);
+                    }
+                }
+                Err(e) => {
+                    e.cancel();
+                }
+            }
+            self.restore_snapshot(snapshot);
+        }
+    }
+
     /// Check to see if a pair of chained operators looks like an attempt at chained comparison,
     /// e.g. `1 < x <= 3`. If so, suggest either splitting the comparison into two, or
     /// parenthesising the leftmost comparison.

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/stmt.rs

@@ -103,7 +103,13 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
                 ForceCollect::Yes => {
                     self.collect_tokens_no_attrs(|this| this.parse_stmt_path_start(lo, attrs))?
                 }
-                ForceCollect::No => self.parse_stmt_path_start(lo, attrs)?,
+                ForceCollect::No => match self.parse_stmt_path_start(lo, attrs) {
+                    Ok(stmt) => stmt,
+                    Err(mut err) => {
+                        self.suggest_add_missing_let_for_stmt(&mut err);
+                        return Err(err);
+                    }
+                },
             }
         } else if let Some(item) = self.parse_item_common(
             attrs.clone(),
@@ -559,7 +565,6 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
                     if self.token == token::Colon {
                         // if next token is following a colon, it's likely a path
                         // and we can suggest a path separator
-                        let ident_span = self.prev_token.span;
                         self.bump();
                         if self.token.span.lo() == self.prev_token.span.hi() {
                             err.span_suggestion_verbose(
@@ -569,14 +574,6 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
                                 Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
                             );
                         }
-                        if self.look_ahead(1, |token| token == &token::Eq) {
-                            err.span_suggestion_verbose(
-                                ident_span.shrink_to_lo(),
-                                "you might have meant to introduce a new binding",
-                                "let ",
-                                Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
-                            );
-                        }
                         if self.sess.unstable_features.is_nightly_build() {
                             // FIXME(Nilstrieb): Remove this again after a few months.
                             err.note("type ascription syntax has been removed, see issue #101728 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101728>");

tests/ui/suggestions/type-ascription-instead-of-let.fixed

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// run-rustfix
+
+fn fun(x: i32) -> i32 { x }
+
+fn main() {
+    let _closure_annotated = |value: i32| -> i32 {
+        let temp: i32 = fun(5i32);
+        //~^ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
+        temp + value + 1
+    };
+}

tests/ui/suggestions/type-ascription-instead-of-let.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
+// run-rustfix
+
 fn fun(x: i32) -> i32 { x }
 
 fn main() {
-    let closure_annotated = |value: i32| -> i32 {
+    let _closure_annotated = |value: i32| -> i32 {
         temp: i32 = fun(5i32);
         //~^ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
         temp + value + 1

tests/ui/suggestions/type-ascription-instead-of-let.stderr

@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
 error: expected identifier, found `:`
-  --> $DIR/type-ascription-instead-of-let.rs:5:13
+  --> $DIR/type-ascription-instead-of-let.rs:7:13
    |
 LL |         temp: i32 = fun(5i32);
    |             ^ expected identifier
+   |
+help: you might have meant to introduce a new binding
+   |
+LL |         let temp: i32 = fun(5i32);
+   |         +++
 
 error: aborting due to previous error
 

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-2.fixed

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// run-rustfix
+
+fn main() {
+    let _v: Vec<i32> = vec![1, 2, 3]; //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
+}

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-2.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// run-rustfix
+
+fn main() {
+    _v: Vec<i32> = vec![1, 2, 3]; //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
+}

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-2.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+error: expected identifier, found `:`
+  --> $DIR/missing-let-in-binding-2.rs:4:7
+   |
+LL |     _v: Vec<i32> = vec![1, 2, 3];
+   |       ^ expected identifier
+   |
+help: you might have meant to introduce a new binding
+   |
+LL |     let _v: Vec<i32> = vec![1, 2, 3];
+   |     +++
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-3.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+struct A {
+    : :u8, //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
+}
+
+fn main() {}

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-3.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+error: expected identifier, found `:`
+  --> $DIR/missing-let-in-binding-3.rs:2:5
+   |
+LL | struct A {
+   |        - while parsing this struct
+LL |     : :u8,
+   |     ^ expected identifier
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-4.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+struct A {
+    : u8 =, //~ ERROR expected identifier, found `:`
+}
+
+fn main() {}

tests/ui/type/missing-let-in-binding-4.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+error: expected identifier, found `:`
+  --> $DIR/missing-let-in-binding-4.rs:2:5
+   |
+LL | struct A {
+   |        - while parsing this struct
+LL |     : u8 =,
+   |     ^ expected identifier
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+