feat: move generics3 to be quiz3

Author: shadows-withal

exercises/generics/generics3.rs

@@ -1,30 +1,62 @@
 // quiz3.rs
-// This is a quiz for the following sections:
-// - Tests
+// This quiz tests:
+// - Generics
+// - Traits
+// An imaginary magical school has a new report card generation system written in Rust!
+// Currently the system only supports creating report cards where the student's grade
+// is represented numerically (e.g. 1.0 -> 5.5).
+// However, the school also issues alphabetical grades (A+ -> F-) and needs
+// to be able to print both types of report card!
 
-// This quiz isn't testing our function -- make it do that in such a way that
-// the test passes. Then write a second test that tests that we get the result
-// we expect to get when we call `times_two` with a negative number.
-// No hints, you can do this :)
+// Make the necessary code changes in the struct ReportCard and the impl block
+// to support alphabetical report cards. Change the Grade in the second test to "A+"
+// to show that your changes allow alphabetical grades.
+
+// Execute `rustlings hint quiz3` or use the `hint` watch subcommand for a hint.
 
 // I AM NOT DONE
 
-pub fn times_two(num: i32) -> i32 {
-    num * 2
+pub struct ReportCard {
+    pub grade: f32,
+    pub student_name: String,
+    pub student_age: u8,
+}
+
+impl ReportCard {
+    pub fn print(&self) -> String {
+        format!("{} ({}) - achieved a grade of {}",
+            &self.student_name, &self.student_age, &self.grade)
+    }
 }
 
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::*;
 
     #[test]
-    fn returns_twice_of_positive_numbers() {
-        assert_eq!(times_two(4), ???);
+    fn generate_numeric_report_card() {
+        let report_card = ReportCard {
+            grade: 2.1,
+            student_name: "Tom Wriggle".to_string(),
+            student_age: 12,
+        };
+        assert_eq!(
+            report_card.print(),
+            "Tom Wriggle (12) - achieved a grade of 2.1"
+        );
     }
 
     #[test]
-    fn returns_twice_of_negative_numbers() {
-        // TODO replace unimplemented!() with an assert for `times_two(-4)`
-        unimplemented!()
+    fn generate_alphabetic_report_card() {
+        // TODO: Make sure to change the grade here after you finish the exercise.
+        let report_card = ReportCard {
+            grade: 2.1,
+            student_name: "Gary Plotter".to_string(),
+            student_age: 11,
+        };
+        assert_eq!(
+            report_card.print(),
+            "Gary Plotter (11) - achieved a grade of A+"
+        );
     }
 }

exercises/quiz3.rs

@@ -681,19 +681,6 @@ Maybe we could update the explicit references to this data type somehow?
 If you are still stuck https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/ch10-01-syntax.html#in-method-definitions
 """
 
-[[exercises]]
-name = "generics3"
-path = "exercises/generics/generics3.rs"
-mode = "test"
-hint = """
-To find the best solution to this challenge you're going to need to think back to your
-knowledge of traits, specifically Trait Bound Syntax -  you may also need this: "use std::fmt::Display;"
-
-This is definitely harder than the last two exercises! You need to think about not only making the
-ReportCard struct generic, but also the correct property - you will need to change the implementation
-of the struct slightly too...you can do it!
-"""
-
 # TRAITS
 
 [[exercises]]
@@ -716,6 +703,16 @@ Try mutating the incoming string vector.
 Vectors provide suitable methods for adding an element at the end. See
 the documentation at: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html"""
 
+# QUIZ 3
+
+[[exercises]]
+name = "quiz3"
+path = "exercises/quiz3.rs"
+mode = "test"
+hint = """
+To find the best solution to this challenge you're going to need to think back to your
+knowledge of traits, specifically Trait Bound Syntax -  you may also need this: "use std::fmt::Display;""""
+
 # TESTS
 
 [[exercises]]
@@ -748,14 +745,6 @@ You can call a function right where you're passing arguments to `assert!` -- so
 something like `assert!(having_fun())`. If you want to check that you indeed get false, you
 can negate the result of what you're doing using `!`, like `assert!(!having_fun())`."""
 
-# TEST 3
-
-[[exercises]]
-name = "quiz3"
-path = "exercises/quiz3.rs"
-mode = "test"
-hint = "No hints this time ;)"
-
 # STANDARD LIBRARY TYPES
 
 [[exercises]]