-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 571
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change CompositConstructionFunctor to CompositeConstructionFunctor #10318
Comments
Attachment: trac_10318-Composit.patch.gz Applies to 4.6.1.alpha2 + patch from #8807 |
comment:2
I'm a bit puzzled why the need for two patches. Is the combined patch one in which could be used instead of the patch on #8807? I have no problems giving the small patch a positive reivew. I guess its up to the release manager how best to handle this - whether #8807 is applied first, and then your simple patch, or just your combined patch. I would have thought the best way to handle this was to just have the simple patch, and make it conditional on #8807 being applied first. Dave |
Reviewer: David Kirkby |
comment:3
Ignore what I said - I see this patch just does many identical spelling corrections - I assumed initially it was just one spelling correction, along with the whole contents of another patch, which made less sence |
comment:4
That's right -- I made it conditional on the #8807 patch since that patch has the word in it, and it also makes a lot of changes to the file where most of the occurrences occur. I'll put a cross-reference at #8807 saying that this ticket has a positive review and can/should be merged right after that one. |
comment:6
depends on #8807 |
Merged: sage-4.6.2.alpha0 |
I think that CompositConstructionFunctor should be CompositeConstructionFunctor.
Component: categories
Author: John Cremona
Reviewer: David Kirkby
Merged: sage-4.6.2.alpha0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10318
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: