Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding combinatorial maps from trees to poset and graphs #14784

Closed
VivianePons opened this issue Jun 20, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Adding combinatorial maps from trees to poset and graphs #14784

VivianePons opened this issue Jun 20, 2013 · 4 comments
Assignees
@sagetrac-sage-combinat
Labels
c: combinatorics p: major / 3 t: enhancement
Milestone
sage-5.12

Comments

@VivianePons
Copy link
Contributor

Both binary trees and ordered trees can be considered as graph or poset objects. Thus we add explicit combinatorial maps.

Depends on #14731

CC: @stumpc5 @sagetrac-chrisjamesberg @tscrim

Component: combinatorics

Keywords: findstat, days49, binaryTrees, OrderedTrees

Author: Viviane Pons

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Merged: sage-5.12.beta2

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14784
@VivianePons VivianePons added this to the sage-5.11 milestone Jun 20, 2013
@VivianePons
Copy link
Contributor Author

Attachment: trac_14784-trees-to-posets-and-graphs-vp.patch.gz

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Jun 21, 2013

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Jun 21, 2013

comment:2

Looks good. Thanks.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Jul 21, 2013
@jdemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

Merged: sage-5.12.beta2

@sagetrac-elixyre sagetrac-elixyre mannequin mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sagetrac-sage-combinat sagetrac-sage-combinat

Labels
c: combinatorics p: major / 3 t: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
sage-5.12
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@tscrim @VivianePons @jdemeyer