We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With
sage: f(x) = floor(x) sage: g(x) = ceil(x) sage: h(x) = factorial(x)
any of the following
sage: f(pi)._numerical_approx() sage: g(pi)._numerical_approx() sage: h(5)._numerical_approx()
will result in
src/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx in sage.symbolic.expression.Expression._numerical_approx (build/cythonized/sage/symbolic/expression.cpp:27487)() 4888 # in pynac 4889 if is_a_numeric(x._gobj): -> 4890 res = py_object_from_numeric(x._gobj) 4891 elif is_a_constant(x._gobj): 4892 res = x.pyobject() TypeError: cannot evaluate symbolic expression numerically
Component: symbolics
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit: 0db18c4
0db18c4
Reviewer: Volker Braun
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18091
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Branch: u/rws/symbolic_floor_ceil_factorial_need__evalf__too
Sorry, something went wrong.
New commits:
18091: symbolic floor,ceil,factorial need `_evalf_` too
Commit: 0db18c4
Changed branch from u/rws/symbolic_floor_ceil_factorial_need__evalf__too to 0db18c4
6c80105
No branches or pull requests
With
any of the following
will result in
Component: symbolics
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
0db18c4
Reviewer: Volker Braun
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18091
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: