-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 557
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document function initialization parameters #24398
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
New commits:
|
Author: Ralf Stephan |
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:6
This documentation is really helpful! Suggestions:
This may be out-of-scope for this ticket but it's so trivial that I must point it out:
|
comment:7
I'm willing to give this a positive review once comment 6 is addressed. |
comment:8
Two quick comments:
|
Changed branch from u/rws/document_function_initialization_parameters to public/symbolic/document_functions-24398 |
comment:13
The documentation does not build. |
comment:14
basically, one cannot use |
comment:15
Replying to @dimpase:
Indeed. It was working in my case probably because the referred document had been already created by a previous
Another solution would be to add a tag in |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:17
Replying to @egourgoulhon:
I've implemented the latter solution in the last commit. Do you agree it is more robust? in particular when generating the pdf documentation (I guess something like |
comment:18
This seems to work, thanks.
than
to make it more clear where it points to. We have quite a number of links like I also wonder whether we should rather be using https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/autosectionlabel.html |
comment:19
it appears that |
Reviewer: Markus Wageringel, Dima Pasechnik |
comment:20
OK, let's get this in. |
comment:21
Replying to @dimpase:
As far as I know, the tags only work within a single sphinx document, but we have many documents which is a reason for many of the relative links to exist. |
comment:22
Replying to @dimpase:
Thanks for having given it a try. This certainly would have been a better solution... |
comment:23
Replying to @mwageringel:
Not always: the following links are inside the same document (the reference manual):
|
Changed branch from public/symbolic/document_functions-24398 to |
The classes in
symbolic/function.pyx
need better docs, esp. the parameters.Component: documentation
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
469d0e2
Reviewer: Markus Wageringel, Dima Pasechnik
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24398
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: