Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doesn't generate parameter/return documentation #57

Closed
ogail opened this issue Mar 15, 2012 · 5 comments
Closed

Doesn't generate parameter/return documentation #57

ogail opened this issue Mar 15, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

@ogail
Copy link

ogail commented Mar 15, 2012

I've a piece of code like this and the generated API documentation doesn't have documentation for each parameter or the return value. It only find documentation for the short and long function description.

/** \* Creates a new block blob or updates the content of an existing block blob. \* Updating an existing block blob overwrites any existing metadata on the blob. \* Partial updates are not supported with createBlockBlob the content of the \* existing blob is overwritten with the content of the new blob. To perform a \* partial update of the content of a block blob, use the createBlockList method. \* \* @param string $container name of the container \* @param string $blob name of the blob \* @param string $content content of the blob \* @param Models\CreateBlobOptions $options optional parameters \* \* @return none. \* \* @see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsazure/dd179451.aspx */ public function createBlockBlob($container, $blob, $content, $options = null) { throw new \Exception(Resources::NOT_IMPLEMENTED_MSG); }
@digitalmediums
Copy link

I have the same issue. Is their any documentation on what is supported?

@theseer
Copy link
Owner

theseer commented Jan 17, 2013

Could you verify if that problem persists with the current git codebase?

@digitalmediums
Copy link

No, Current code base actually finds and generates code on one of my branches, but on another it crashes with the following issue

#85

@svscorp
Copy link

svscorp commented Feb 8, 2013

For me the problem still exists.

@theseer
Copy link
Owner

theseer commented Dec 19, 2013

Please verify the results against the current codebase (aka Release 0.6.2 +)

@theseer theseer closed this as completed Feb 17, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants