-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: 🧷 Create snyk-security.yml #1406
Conversation
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file named File-Level Changes
Tips
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @Anselmoo - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Blocking issues:
- Docker build command syntax issue (link)
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🔴 General issues: 1 blocking issue, 5 other issues
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
|
||
on: | ||
push: | ||
branches: ["main", "gh-pages"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (performance): Consider limiting branch triggers
Triggering the workflow on every push to 'main' and 'gh-pages' might be too broad. Consider limiting it to specific branches or tags to avoid unnecessary runs.
branches: ["main", "gh-pages"] | |
branches: | |
- main | |
- gh-pages | |
- 'releases/*' |
run: snyk iac test --report # || true | ||
|
||
# Build the docker image for testing | ||
- name: Build a Docker image |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): Docker build command syntax issue
The Docker build command should be docker build -t <tag> .
instead of docker build -t ./Dockerfile .
. The -t
flag is for tagging the image, not specifying the Dockerfile.
# Runs Snyk Code (SAST) analysis and uploads result into GitHub. | ||
# Use || true to not fail the pipeline | ||
- name: Snyk Code test | ||
run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif # || true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (bug_risk): Consider handling Snyk command failures
Using || true
to ignore failures might hide critical issues. Consider handling failures more gracefully or logging them for further inspection.
run: snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif # || true | |
run: | | |
snyk code test --sarif > snyk-code.sarif || { | |
echo "Snyk Code test failed. Please check the logs for more details."; | |
exit 1; | |
} |
# Runs Snyk Infrastructure as Code (IaC) analysis and uploads result to Snyk. | ||
# Use || true to not fail the pipeline. | ||
- name: Snyk IaC test and report | ||
run: snyk iac test --report # || true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion (bug_risk): Consider handling Snyk IaC command failures
Using || true
to ignore failures might hide critical issues. Consider handling failures more gracefully or logging them for further inspection.
run: snyk iac test --report # || true | |
run: | | |
snyk iac test --report || echo "Snyk IaC test failed, but continuing pipeline" >> snyk_iac_errors.log |
run: docker build -t ./Dockerfile . | ||
# Runs Snyk Container (Container and SCA) analysis and uploads result to Snyk. | ||
- name: Snyk Container monitor | ||
run: snyk container monitor ./Dockerfile --file=Dockerfile |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Redundant Dockerfile path
The --file=Dockerfile
flag is redundant when the Dockerfile is in the default location. Consider removing it for simplicity.
run: snyk container monitor ./Dockerfile --file=Dockerfile | |
run: snyk container monitor ./Dockerfile |
- name: Set up Snyk CLI to check for security issues | ||
# Snyk can be used to break the build when it detects security issues. | ||
# In this case we want to upload the SAST issues to GitHub Code Scanning | ||
uses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Pinning actions to a specific commit
Pinning actions to a specific commit ensures stability but might miss out on important updates. Consider using a version tag for a balance between stability and updates.
uses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb | |
uses: snyk/actions/setup@v1 |
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1406 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 44 44
Lines 4467 4467
=========================================
Hits 4467 4467
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
All PR-Submissions:
Pull Requests for the same
update/change?
New ✨✨ Feature-Submissions:
Changes to ⚙️ Core-Features:
us to include them?
Summary by Sourcery
This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow to integrate Snyk security scanning into the CI pipeline. The workflow will analyze code, open source dependencies, containers, and infrastructure as code for security issues, and upload the results to GitHub Security Code Scanning.