-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Update Docker actions to latest versions #1448
Conversation
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the Docker actions in the GitHub workflow file to their latest versions. The changes primarily involve upgrading the versions of various Docker-related actions to ensure compatibility and leverage new features or improvements. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @Anselmoo - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- The removal of the comment about third-party actions reduces important information for users. Consider keeping or updating this notice.
- The new comment '# cos' is unclear and doesn't provide any meaningful information. Please either remove it or replace it with a more descriptive comment.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ | |||
name: CD - Publish Docker image on ghcr.io | |||
|
|||
# This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub. | |||
# They are provided by a third-party and are governed by | |||
# cos |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Clarify the meaning of 'cos' comment or restore original explanation
The original comment provided important context about third-party actions. Consider either expanding on what 'cos' means or restoring the original explanation for better clarity.
# cos | |
# This step is necessary because of third-party actions that require specific configurations |
id: build-and-push | ||
with: | ||
platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64 | ||
push: true | ||
tags: ${{ steps.docker_meta.outputs.tags }} | ||
labels: ${{ steps.docker_meta.outputs.labels }} | ||
cache-from: type=gha |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
question: Explain caching configuration and commented-out output line
The addition of caching is a good optimization. Could you explain the specific benefits of this caching configuration? Also, what's the intention behind the commented-out line for additional output configuration?
labels: ${{ steps.docker_meta.outputs.labels }} | ||
cache-from: type=gha | ||
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max | ||
# outputs: type=image,name=target,annotation-index.org.opencontainers.image.description=${{ fromJSON(steps.docker_meta.outputs.json).labels['org.opencontainers.image.description'] }} | ||
|
||
# https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions#using-an-intermediate-environment-variable | ||
- name: Sign image with a key |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚨 question (security): Provide more details about the image signing process
Adding image signing is a good security practice. Could you provide more information about how this signing process is implemented and what key is being used?
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1448 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 44 44
Lines 4467 4467
=========================================
Hits 4467 4467
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
All PR-Submissions:
Pull Requests for the same
update/change?
New ✨✨ Feature-Submissions:
Changes to ⚙️ Core-Features:
us to include them?
Summary by Sourcery
This pull request updates the Docker actions used in the GitHub workflow configuration to their latest versions, ensuring compatibility and leveraging new features and improvements.