build: 🔖 Update to post-release

[Anselmoo]

• Also update pre-commit package to version 3.7.1

All PR-Submissions:

---

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open
  Pull Requests for the same
  update/change?

New ✨✨ Feature-Submissions:

---

• Does your submission pass tests?
• Have you lint your code locally prior to submission? Fixed:
• This PR is for a new feature, not a bug fix.

Changes to ⚙️ Core-Features:

---

• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like
  us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
• Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?

Summary by Sourcery

This pull request updates the project version to 1.0.3.post0 to mark a post-release state.

• Build:
  • Updated the project version to 1.0.3.post0 in preparation for post-release.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 3 files.

	Filename	Status
❔	poetry.lock	Unsupported file format
❔	pyproject.toml	Unsupported file format
✔️	spectrafit/__init__.py	Analyzed

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the version of the spectrafit package to '1.0.3.post0' to reflect a post-release update. Additionally, it updates the pre-commit package to version 3.7.1.

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Anselmoo - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• The PR description mentions updating the pre-commit package to version 3.7.1, but this change is not reflected in the provided diff. Could you clarify if this update was made in a different file or if it was accidentally omitted from the PR?

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f72d2a2) to head (4cacaa5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1451   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           44        44           
  Lines         4467      4467           
=========================================
  Hits          4467      4467           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
spectrafit/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)