Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add thread_local_storage property to Context #167

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 2, 2023

Conversation

EvanR-Dev
Copy link
Contributor

In addition to: Azure/azure-functions-python-worker#1171

Added property to Library.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (dev@847f763). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 83.33%.

❗ Current head bba8884 differs from pull request most recent head fc6c6b0. Consider uploading reports for the commit fc6c6b0 to get more accurate results

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev     #167   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   90.35%           
======================================
  Files          ?       53           
  Lines          ?     3037           
  Branches       ?      805           
======================================
  Hits           ?     2744           
  Misses         ?      216           
  Partials       ?       77           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.31% <83.33%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
azure/functions/_http_asgi.py 90.32% <ø> (ø)
azure/functions/_abc.py 75.89% <80.00%> (ø)
azure/functions/_http_wsgi.py 91.08% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@EvanR-Dev EvanR-Dev marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2023 17:20
@gavin-aguiar gavin-aguiar merged commit 093825e into dev Mar 2, 2023
@gavin-aguiar gavin-aguiar deleted the evanroman/add-thread-local-context branch March 2, 2023 23:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants