Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: set timeout to 10 seconds #168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

test: set timeout to 10 seconds #168

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

javier-godoy
Copy link
Member

@javier-godoy javier-godoy commented Mar 10, 2025

This test is flaky. Try a longer timeout to see if it stabilizes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Extended the timeout duration for automated tests to allow for longer execution times, enhancing overall test stability and reducing premature test failures. This internal improvement does not impact any user-facing features.

@javier-godoy javier-godoy requested review from mlopezFC and paodb March 10, 2025 17:52
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the TEST_TIMEOUT constant in the ConcurrentExportTests class, increasing the timeout value from 5000 milliseconds to 10000 milliseconds. The change affects tests that use this constant for their timeout configuration and does not modify any test logic or flow.

Changes

File Path Changes Summary
src/.../ConcurrentExportTests.java Updated the TEST_TIMEOUT constant from 5000 to 10000 milliseconds for test timeout.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mlopezFC
  • paodb

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 26f2e0b and 002af85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/test/ConcurrentExportTests.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/test/ConcurrentExportTests.java (1)

59-59: Increasing timeout helps address flaky tests.

This change doubles the test timeout from 5 to 10 seconds, which should help address the flaky test mentioned in the PR description. Increasing timeouts is a reasonable approach for tests that occasionally need more time to complete, particularly when dealing with concurrent operations as this test class does.

However, while this change will likely fix the immediate issue, consider investigating what's causing the intermittent timeouts - it might indicate a deeper issue with test isolation, resource contention, or environment-specific slowness.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@paodb paodb merged commit dc8c89c into master Mar 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@paodb paodb deleted the javier-godoy-patch-1 branch March 10, 2025 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants