Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 4, 2019. It is now read-only.

Full 0.5/0.4 compat + fix failing tests #113

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 11, 2016
Merged

Full 0.5/0.4 compat + fix failing tests #113

merged 5 commits into from
Jun 11, 2016

Conversation

quinnj
Copy link
Member

@quinnj quinnj commented Jun 10, 2016

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 82.047% when pulling 05d405f on quinnj:master into d0b94ae on JuliaStats:master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 10, 2016

Current coverage is 82.04%

Merging #113 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%

@@             master       #113   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            13         13          
  Lines           673        674     +1   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits            552        553     +1   
  Misses          121        121          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by d0b94ae...bc430e4

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ module TestConstructors
@test isa(Z, NullableVector{Int})
@test Z.isnull == [false, true, false, false, false, false, true]

Y = NullableArray([1, "na", 2, 3, 4, 5, "na"], Int, ASCIIString)
Y = NullableArray([1, "na", 2, 3, 4, 5, "na"], Int, Compat.ASCIIString)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd rather change this into Y = NullableArray([1, nothing, 2, 3, 4, 5, nothing], Int, Void) or Y = NullableArray(Nullable{Int}[1, Nullable(), 2, 3, 4, 5, Nullable()]).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 82.047% when pulling 19d5776 on quinnj:master into d0b94ae on JuliaStats:master.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
module TestConstructors
using Base.Test
using Base.Test, Compat
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the change, you don't need Compat AFAICT. Other than that, looks good to merge. Thanks for doing this!

@quinnj
Copy link
Member Author

quinnj commented Jun 10, 2016

Updated

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 10, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 82.047% when pulling bc430e4 on quinnj:master into d0b94ae on JuliaStats:master.

@nalimilan nalimilan merged commit 9842b91 into JuliaStats:master Jun 11, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants