Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(kafka-upstream): add some how-to document pages for the new feature of kong gateway's kafka-upstream plugin #8546

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

windmgc
Copy link
Member

@windmgc windmgc commented Mar 12, 2025

Description

This PR adds some how-to document pages for the new 3.10 feature of Kong Gateway's kafka-upstream plugin.

https://konghq.atlassian.net/browse/KAG-6422

Testing instructions

Preview link:

Checklist

@windmgc windmgc added review:tech Request for technical review on the docs platform or processes. review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly? labels Mar 12, 2025
@windmgc windmgc requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2025 09:09
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Deploy Preview for kongdocs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fc1ac85
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kongdocs/deploys/67d24ec5e867a3000854d713
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8546--kongdocs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
9 paths audited
Performance: 92 (🟢 up 5 from production)
Accessibility: 93 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 98 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 99 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@lena-larionova lena-larionova added this to the Gateway 3.10 milestone Mar 12, 2025
@lena-larionova lena-larionova self-assigned this Mar 12, 2025
@windmgc
Copy link
Member Author

windmgc commented Mar 13, 2025

@lena-larionova Thank you very much for the detailed review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review:general Review for general accuracy and presentation. Does the doc work? Does it output correctly? review:tech Request for technical review on the docs platform or processes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants