Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: merge staging to master #74

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

ci: merge staging to master #74

merged 40 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

This is an automatic PR generated by the CI/CD pipeline. This will be automatically fast-forward merged if successful.

Copy link
Author

2 similar comments
Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

@CMCDragonkai
Copy link
Member

I don't think js-db is the right repo to start off with this.

The correct flow is actually in js-quic due to the cross platform libraries being published to NPM.

@brynblack
Copy link
Member

I don't think js-db is the right repo to start off with this.

The correct flow is actually in js-quic due to the cross platform libraries being published to NPM.

I'll focus on migrating js-quic over then. I'll then copy the workflow for js-db and other native repos.

@CMCDragonkai
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure if the C++ code is amenable to the style of build outputs in js-quic. So I would actually start an issue working on replacing the C++ code with a Rust layer instead, it would likely be alot faster and fix the issues:

I would not start on this until js-workers has been migrated to ESM first as it is dependent on it.

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Copy link
Author

Pipeline Succeeded on 14072745432 for cf2e6d9

https://github.com/MatrixAI/js-db/actions/runs/14072745432

@maxwell-aiden maxwell-aiden merged commit cf2e6d9 into master Mar 26, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants