Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve fuzzer recursive model providers #1039

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022
Merged

Improve fuzzer recursive model providers #1039

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022

Conversation

Markoutte
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Minor change with recursive model providers improvements

Type of Change

  • Minor bug fix (non-breaking small changes)

How Has This Been Tested?

Automated Testing

All fuzzers tests should pass.

Manual Scenario

See #755, #988

Checklist:

  • The change followed the style guidelines of the UTBot project
  • Self-review of the code is passed
  • The change contains enough commentaries, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • New documentation is provided or existed one is altered
  • No new warnings
  • New tests have been added
  • All tests pass locally with my changes

@Markoutte Markoutte marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2022 10:19
@Markoutte Markoutte merged commit a2675b5 into main Oct 3, 2022
@Markoutte Markoutte deleted the pelevin/improve-recursive-model-providers branch October 3, 2022 10:21
@alisevych alisevych added this to the 2022.10.1 Release milestone Oct 7, 2022
AbdullinAM pushed a commit to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
@Markoutte @AbdullinAM
Improve fuzzer recursive model providers (UnitTestBot#1039)
9448594
AbdullinAM pushed a commit to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2022
@Markoutte @AbdullinAM
Improve fuzzer recursive model providers (UnitTestBot#1039)
0cedf7a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@volivan239 volivan239 volivan239 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2022.10.1 Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Markoutte @volivan239 @alisevych