Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(AD-1026) Bump puppeteer-lottie #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ddresselhaus
Copy link

No description provided.

@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@
},
"dependencies": {
"commander": "^4.1.1",
"puppeteer-lottie": "github:adpipe/puppeteer-lottie"
"puppeteer-lottie": "github:adpipe/puppeteer-lottie#06487ee3c4e9aaf399443f281a7058cd7c18d192"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we be using #master instead of specifying a commit?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

honestly I was thinking about going in the opposite direction and specifying sha at both the CLI and smallville level, to facilitate easy rollback. thoughts?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oooh how does it facilitate easy rollback? I thought you'd have to come in here and change the commit SHAs anyway

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess I mean moving forward, the next change can just be a sha change in smallville, which will pickup the correct sha in puppeteer-lottie-cli which will pick up the correct sha in puppeteer-lottie. then rolling back the sha specification will ensure that we're not randomly caching a version pin. If i merge this change now, the next smallville version will pick it up, because right now it's picking master.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ohhh yeah i see what you're saying that makes sense

@kwbock kwbock changed the title Bump puppeteer-lottie (AD-1026) Bump puppeteer-lottie Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants