-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the RingSolver work with generic rings (#1116) #1769
Make the RingSolver work with generic rings (#1116) #1769
Conversation
open import Tactic.RingSolver.Core.AlmostCommutativeRing | ||
|
||
|
||
module IntegerExamples where |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could add these examples to the existing README.Tactic.RingSolver?
@felixwellen unless you have any objections in the next week or so I'll close this PR as it's going stale? |
Yes, I think it can be closed. From my vague memories, the status was, that I didn't understand why some expressions do not normalize and I don't think it is worth figuring out. |
Work on issue #1116 . So far, this only concerns the problem that deBruijn-indices have to be adjusted when using the forall-version of the solver macro.