Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make the RingSolver work with generic rings (#1116) #1769

Closed

Conversation

felixwellen
Copy link

Work on issue #1116 . So far, this only concerns the problem that deBruijn-indices have to be adjusted when using the forall-version of the solver macro.

open import Tactic.RingSolver.Core.AlmostCommutativeRing


module IntegerExamples where
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could add these examples to the existing README.Tactic.RingSolver?

@MatthewDaggitt
Copy link
Contributor

@felixwellen unless you have any objections in the next week or so I'll close this PR as it's going stale?

@felixwellen
Copy link
Author

Yes, I think it can be closed. From my vague memories, the status was, that I didn't understand why some expressions do not normalize and I don't think it is worth figuring out.

@gallais gallais closed this May 11, 2023
@gallais gallais added status: won't-merge Decided against merging the PR in. and removed status: being-worked-on labels May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug status: won't-merge Decided against merging the PR in. tactics
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants