Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LUCENE-7041 Upgrade to Apache Tika 1.12 #10

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lewismc
Copy link
Member

@lewismc lewismc commented Feb 22, 2016

Trivial update. @uschindler I attempted running ant test locally with the following failures

   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSolrJ
   [junit4] Completed [579/579 (6!)] on J3 in 0.02s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 64AD6FE9325CC7B0]:
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.TestRequestStatusCollectionAPI.test
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribCursorPagingTest.test
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.DeleteLastCustomShardedReplicaTest.test
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.SimpleCollectionCreateDeleteTest.test
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMiniSolrCloudCluster.testSegmentTerminateEarly
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMiniSolrCloudCluster.testStopAllStartAll
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMiniSolrCloudCluster.testCollectionCreateWithoutCoresThenDelete
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMiniSolrCloudCluster.testCollectionCreateSearchDelete
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandlerTest.testDeleteInstanceDir
   [junit4]   - org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandlerTest (suite)
   [junit4]
   [junit4]
   [junit4] JVM J0:     0.60 ..   655.76 =   655.16s
   [junit4] JVM J1:     0.85 ..   656.59 =   655.74s
   [junit4] JVM J2:     0.85 ..   200.28 =   199.44s
   [junit4] JVM J3:     0.60 ..  1037.32 =  1036.72s
   [junit4] Execution time total: 17 minutes 17 seconds
   [junit4] Tests summary: 579 suites (8 ignored), 2331 tests, 2 suite-level errors, 8 errors, 1 failure, 1320 ignored (59 assumptions)

BUILD FAILED
/usr/local/lucene-solr/build.xml:59: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/local/lucene-solr/solr/build.xml:233: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/local/lucene-solr/solr/common-build.xml:524: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/local/lucene-solr/lucene/common-build.xml:1457: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/usr/local/lucene-solr/lucene/common-build.xml:1014: There were test failures: 579 suites (8 ignored), 2331 tests, 2 suite-level errors, 8 errors, 1 failure, 1320 ignored (59 assumptions) [seed: 64AD6FE9325CC7B0]

Total time: 34 minutes 7 seconds

@janhoy
Copy link
Contributor

janhoy commented Feb 23, 2016

Hi, you should also manually upgrade relevant Tika dependencies. See lucene-solr/solr/contrib/extraction/ivy.xml

When you compare changes between 1.7 and 1.12 you may find that Tika also added new dependencies such as parsers etc. Please make a list of these and suggest which of them you feel MUST be included with Solr. Note that we do not include every single Tika dependency today, to keep the distro slimmer.

@lewismc
Copy link
Member Author

lewismc commented Apr 20, 2016

This PR is superseded by #31

@lewismc lewismc closed this Apr 20, 2016
@lewismc lewismc deleted the LUCENE-7041 branch April 20, 2016 00:16
petersomogyi pushed a commit to petersomogyi/lucene-solr that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2018
* CDH-61400 Docker based Solr upgrade test framework
Co-author: Peter Szantai-Kis <[email protected]>

* CDH-61400 Fix concurrency issue in using CloudSolrClient (intermittent UnsupportedSchemeException)
munendrasn added a commit to munendrasn/lucene-solr that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2020
msokolov pushed a commit to msokolov/lucene-solr that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2021
epugh pushed a commit to epugh/lucene-solr-1 that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants