HDDS-12586. Ozone Recon - Containers page showing incorrect count for the number of keys for various unhealthy states of containers. #8071
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… the number of keys for various unhealthy states of containers.
|
Closing this because , needs change in UI field, as it is number of blocks instead of number of keys. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Containers page showing incorrect count for the number of keys for various unhealthy states of containers.
Currently the API picks the key count from org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.ContainerInfo#numberOfKeys which seems inconsistent. So to correctly showing the value, we should pick using ContainerKeyMapping info where recon maintains container to key mapping for each container.
What is the link to the Apache JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-12586
How was this patch tested?
This patch is tested using junit and integration tests and using local docker cluster.