Skip to content

chore(deps): Bump trivy-aws and trivy-checks #6796

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

chore(deps): Bump trivy-aws and trivy-checks #6796

merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

simar7
Copy link
Member

@simar7 simar7 commented May 28, 2024

Description

Bumps trivy-aws and trivy-checks to the latest released versions.

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I've followed the conventions in the PR title.
  • I've added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I've updated the documentation with the relevant information (if needed).
  • I've added usage information (if the PR introduces new options)
  • I've included a "before" and "after" example to the description (if the PR is a user interface change).

@simar7 simar7 requested a review from nikpivkin May 28, 2024 04:42
@simar7 simar7 self-assigned this May 28, 2024
@simar7 simar7 marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2024 05:08
@simar7 simar7 requested a review from knqyf263 as a code owner May 28, 2024 05:08
@simar7 simar7 added this pull request to the merge queue May 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 03fc534 May 28, 2024
12 checks passed
@simar7 simar7 deleted the bump-iac-deps-2 branch May 28, 2024 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nikpivkin nikpivkin nikpivkin approved these changes

@knqyf263 knqyf263 Awaiting requested review from knqyf263 knqyf263 is a code owner

Assignees

@simar7 simar7

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@simar7 @nikpivkin