improve coverage #2
Labels
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
Comments
demurgos
added a commit
to demurgos/v8-coverage-merge
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2018
This commit adds end-to-end tests using generated fixtures. For each fixture, there are multiple entry points. Coverage is first collected when running each entry point in its own Node process, then when running all of them in the same process. The end-to-end tests check that merging the coverages from the individual entry points returns the coverage of the combined run. The library currently fails these tests: I believe that it indicates bugs in the current implementation. This commit also improves coverage (see bcoe#2).
demurgos
added a commit
to demurgos/v8-coverage-merge
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2018
This commit adds end-to-end tests using generated fixtures. For each fixture, there are multiple entry points. Coverage is first collected when running each entry point in its own Node process, then when running all of them in the same process. The end-to-end tests check that merging the coverages from the individual entry points returns the coverage of the combined run. The library currently fails these tests: I believe that it indicates bugs in the current implementation. This commit also improves coverage (see bcoe#2).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: