-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 767
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ostreambuf.iter.ops] not divided into subsections as [istreambuf.iter.ops] #1429
Comments
I don't think we are going to change stable names. |
But we've already made |
@lynnboy: Wasn't that for new content post-C++14? Things that were added in this revision can still be changed, indeed. |
The change from |
I see. I guess we do change stable names then... |
The stable names are really bad, and those single-paragraph descriptions should never have gotten separate sections to start with. |
There was one subsection for every operator, yet everything fits on half a page. Fixes cplusplus#1429.
[reverse.iter.ops] also has many single-paragraph subsections for individual operators. So possibly that one could be cleaned up as well. |
This seems to be a pervasive issue in that area; see [front.insert.iter.ops] and [back.insert.iter.ops]. The [reverse.iter.ops] that you mentioned are more than half a page, though, so some kind of subdivision (e.g. "comparison operators", "arithmetic") might be worthwhile. In short, all of [predef.iterators] is affected, and we should come up with a common approach for that subsection instead of fixing individual issues. @zygoloid, what do you think? |
Editorial committee consensus: Fold mini-sections for operators and rename "::" in stable names. |
There was one subsection for every operator, yet everything fits on half a page. Fixes cplusplus#1429.
There was one subsection for every operator, yet everything fits on half a page. Fixes cplusplus#1429.
@jensmaurer: Did we mean to close this issue? Didn't you say there were other aspects to it not yet dealt with by pull requests? |
|
there are several [istreambuf.iterator::op...] sections under [istreambuf.iterator],
but there is only a combined [ostreambuf.iter.ops] section under [ostreambuf.iterator].
This is inconsistent.
Consider split it into subsections.
Also: consider change
::
into.
and*
intostar
in section labelsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: