Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2025-02 LWG Motion 9] P3287R3 Exploration of namespaces for std::simd #7694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2025

Conversation

mattkretz
Copy link
Member

Fixes #7668
Also fixes cplusplus/papers#1940

@mattkretz
Copy link
Member Author

@jensmaurer Am I allowed to rebase this onto motions-2025-02-lwg-12 and force-push? Or am I doing the whole "motion depends on another motion" thing wrong here?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

The ordering of the motions is apparently "wrong", so @tkoeppe should decide what he wants here.

@mattkretz
Copy link
Member Author

The ordering of the motions is apparently "wrong", so @tkoeppe should decide what he wants here.

FWIW, P3287R3 states the dependency on P2663 and P2933 (P3441 was overlooked at that point) and this was discussed in LWG. The intent by LWG should be clear. I understand this is purely a "process" question?

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@tkoeppe usually applies the motions in order. If a different order is more practical, that's probably fine, but for @tkoeppe to say what he wants there.

@mattkretz mattkretz force-pushed the motions-2025-02-lwg-9 branch from a74a955 to dbdd3f8 Compare February 28, 2025 10:48
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 15, 2025

Yeah, it would have been nice to have reordered the motions, but it's fine, I can postpone this one to after the other paper.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2025-02-lwg-9 branch from dbdd3f8 to b93a719 Compare March 15, 2025 14:20
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 15, 2025

Or rather, I've pulled 13, then 12 forward, and now the rest should be able to go in in order.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 54e55f1 into cplusplus:main Mar 15, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants