New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[basic.scope.scope] Replace "warning" with "diagnostic message" #7728

Open

Eisenwave wants to merge 1 commit into cplusplus:main from Eisenwave:patch-43

+1 −1

Contributor

Eisenwave commented Mar 10, 2025

We don't usually say "warning", not even in https://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.error#:preprocessing_directive,warning. Everywhere else, the standard talks about diagnostic messages.


          [basic.scope.scope] Replace "warning" with "diagnostic message"

Eisenwave mentioned this pull request

CWG3005 [basic.scope.scope] Function parameters can be name-independent cplusplus/CWG#681

Open

Contributor

frederick-vs-ja commented Mar 11, 2025

Hmm, the standard wording is currently saying "warning" for many times:

diagnostic message: [dcl.pre], [dcl.fct.def.delete], [dcl.attr.deprecated], [defns.diagnostic], [defns.undefined], [intro.compliance.general], [cpp.error]
warning: [basic.scope.scope], [dcl.attr.fallthrough], [dcl.attr.unused], [dcl.attr.nodiscard], [dcl.attr.noreturn], [diff.expr], [diff.stmt]

Eisenwave mentioned this pull request

Replace "warning" with "diagnostic" #7730

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet