Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: bump pymatgen-analysis-defects and skip failed tests #1659

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Oct 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the version constraint for the pymatgen-analysis-defects package, enabling access to newer features and fixes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Commented out failing assertions in test methods to address issues with structure comparisons, indicating a need for future fixes.
  • Chores

    • Minor updates to the test files to manage test assertions effectively.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the pyproject.toml file, specifically modifying the version constraint for the pymatgen-analysis-defects package in the optional dependencies section for tests. Additionally, two test files, test_interstitial.py and test_vacancy.py, have been altered to comment out assertions that compare two structures, indicating that these tests are currently disabled due to failures. No other significant changes were made to the structure or content of the files.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pyproject.toml Updated pymatgen-analysis-defects version constraint in [project.optional-dependencies.test] from <2023.08.22 to >=2024.10.22.
tests/auto_test/test_interstitial.py Commented out assertion in test_make_confs_bcc method, indicating a TODO to fix a failed test.
tests/auto_test/test_vacancy.py Commented out assertion in test_make_confs_0 method, indicating a need to fix a failed test.

Possibly related PRs

  • ci: test against numpy v2 #1614: The changes in pyproject.toml regarding the numpy dependency are related to the main PR's modifications in the same file, indicating updates to dependencies in the testing section.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between da19957 and 55839bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/auto_test/test_interstitial.py (1)

96-96: Enhance the TODO comment with more context.

The current TODO comment lacks information about the nature of the failure. Consider expanding it to include:

  • What specifically failed (structure mismatch details)
  • Any error messages or differences observed
  • Reference to related issues/PRs

Example:

-# TODO: fix the failed test
+# TODO(#issue_number): Structure comparison fails due to [specific reason].
+# Error: [error message or difference details]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f303aa8 and da19957.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/auto_test/test_interstitial.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/auto_test/test_vacancy.py (1 hunks)

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm October 29, 2024 01:40
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (devel@f303aa8). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 21 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             devel    #1659   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage         ?   49.53%           
========================================
  Files            ?       83           
  Lines            ?    14849           
  Branches         ?        0           
========================================
  Hits             ?     7356           
  Misses           ?     7493           
  Partials         ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 552b689 into deepmodeling:devel Nov 4, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants