Adding Redaction and Compliance docs

[mariamgerges]

This PR adds documentation pages for redaction and compliance.

---

Internal previews

📄 File	🔗 Preview link
docs/core/extensions/compliance.md	docs/core/extensions/compliance
docs/core/extensions/data-classification.md	docs/core/extensions/data-classification
docs/core/extensions/data-redaction.md	docs/core/extensions/data-redaction
docs/fundamentals/toc.yml	docs/fundamentals/toc

[dariusclay]

@IEvangelist this is for the data classification and redaction extensions in dotnet/extensions. Thank you @mariamgerges for taking this on!

Question I have, is location within the toc -- I would expect it to be under Runtime Libraries Overview, but want to hear some opinions from the folks here.

[IEvangelist]

@IEvangelist this is for the data classification and redaction extensions in dotnet/extensions. Thank you @mariamgerges for taking this on!

Question I have, is location within the toc -- I would expect it to be under Runtime Libraries Overview, but want to hear some opinions from the folks here.

Hi @dariusclay - yeah, I agree it should be under the Runtime libraries TOC instead. This is neither diagnostics nor instrumentation. I'll review this in a bit. Great job @mariamgerges

[mariamgerges]

I moved the files and updated the Runtime libraries TOC.

[mariamgerges]

@IEvangelist The OPS status checker build step is failing, and I don't understand why, can you help?

[IEvangelist]

@IEvangelist The OPS status checker build step is failing, and I don't understand why, can you help?

It's a safety net, we have that check in place to fail when the OpenPublishing.Build check has warnings. I don't think any of these are related to your PR, so you're good.

[IEvangelist]

This is looking great, lots of nits to help improve this already awesome content. Let's get these suggestions in and I'll do another small review.

[IEvangelist]

Just a quick heads up @mariamgerges - when you use tabs, you need specify also close them out with a ---. This comes after the two headings in this case. See here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/help/platform/tabbed-conceptual-overview?toc=%2Fhelp%2Fplatform%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fhelp%2Fplatform%2Fbreadcrumb%2Ftoc.json&tabs=linux%2Cazure-cli

[IEvangelist]

This is really shaping up nicely. I think we might want to make a few more tweaks. We could benefit from an Overview article that speaks to the benefits of these libraries and their overall compliance objectives. Then, in the compliance article, let's pivot a bit, moving the Redaction bits into the redaction article, and shifting this to be more about data classification. Then the TOC would look more like this:

• Compliance
  • Overview
  • Data classification
  • Redaction

[mariamgerges]

This is really shaping up nicely. I think we might want to make a few more tweaks. We could benefit from an Overview article that speaks to the benefits of these libraries and their overall compliance objectives. Then, in the compliance article, let's pivot a bit, moving the Redaction bits into the redaction article, and shifting this to be more about data classification. Then the TOC would look more like this:

• Compliance

  • Overview
  • Data classification
  • Redaction

I updated the docs, created an overview article and a separate doc for data classification and moved the redaction bits to the data redaction doc and updated the TOC

[IEvangelist]

Looking much better, we have a few more things to improve then we can ship this!