Skip to content

Complex type collection support #31237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
3 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #31238
AndriySvyryd opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 9 comments
Open
3 of 8 tasks
Tracked by #31238

Complex type collection support #31237

AndriySvyryd opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@AndriySvyryd
Copy link
Member

AndriySvyryd commented Jul 12, 2023

The collections need to be ordered, since they will be mapped to JSON arrays. (Unless we allow to map to objects, see #28861)

This only covers collections of reference types. For value types see #31411

  • Model building and validation
  • Compiled model support
  • Migrations support
  • Refactor change tracking property accessors
  • Change tracking support
  • Update pipeline support
  • Query support
  • ExecuteUpdate support
@roji
Copy link
Member

roji commented Dec 23, 2023

Note also #11799 which is about supporting tuples as well.

@rlcarrierscsharp

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@roji

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@rlcarrierscsharp

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@roji

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@ajcvickers

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@rlcarrierscsharp

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@roji

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor

Note: consider #33913 when working on complex type collections.

AndriySvyryd added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 27, 2025
@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd modified the milestones: Backlog, 10.0.0 Mar 31, 2025
@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd self-assigned this Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants