Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TTGO T-OI PLUS RISC-V ESP32-C3 Development Board Added #5576

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2021
Merged

TTGO T-OI PLUS RISC-V ESP32-C3 Development Board Added #5576

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2021

Conversation

thambirm
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Adding support for TTGO T-OI PLUS Development Board

Impact

support for TTGO T-OI PLUS board

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 22, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@me-no-dev
Copy link
Member

@thambirm would you please sign the CLA? We can not merge this before you do.

@thambirm
Copy link
Contributor Author

thambirm commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@me-no-dev me-no-dev merged commit f3f6dad into espressif:master Oct 1, 2021
@ekawahyu
Copy link

I understand that those pin numbering and assignment are based on TTGO T-OI PLUS V1.0 PINMAP, but would it be better if we try to keep those pinouts compatible with the rest of D1 mini shields?

There are many different (and incorrect) pin mapping out there when you search for it with Google. If possible, could we make some changes on these pins to keep compatibility with D1 pin mapping please?

@ekawahyu
Copy link

D1 Mini compatible pin mapping:

static const uint8_t SDA = 18;
static const uint8_t SCL = 19;

static const uint8_t SS = 10;
static const uint8_t MOSI = 7;
static const uint8_t MISO = 6;
static const uint8_t SCK = 5;

@ekawahyu
Copy link

@thambirm @me-no-dev are you guys open for a PR fix for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants