Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement final MISRA C 2023 rule amendments #872

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MichaelRFairhurst
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This covers all of the remaining rule amendments for MISRA C 2023.

Ideally for 18-6, we eventually support tss_t as an ObjectIdentity. However, it's a little tricky because currently ObjectIdentity extends Element, and a tss_t is already a VariableObjectIdentity (the tss_t object itself, not the thread storage it points to). So we can't simply override ObjectIdentity for tss_t objects to make a new thread local. Additionally, we could treat each tss_get() call as an ObjectIdentity but that diverges from the intention of the class, because the tss_get call doesn't identify the object, its the tss_t variable that identifies it.

We can open an issue and worry about that later if we wish. For now, we cover _Thread_local variables more comprehensively than tss_ts, which is probably A-OK.

Change request type

  • Release or process automation (GitHub workflows, internal scripts)
  • Internal documentation
  • External documentation
  • Query files (.ql, .qll, .qls or unit tests)
  • External scripts (analysis report or other code shipped as part of a release)

Rules with added or modified queries

  • No rules added
  • Queries have been added for the following rules:
    • RULE-18-6 - new rule to handle new case (thread locals assigned to static storage duration objects)
  • Queries have been modified for the following rules:
    • DIR-4-9
    • RULE-1-4,
    • RULE-21-12

Release change checklist

A change note (development_handbook.md#change-notes) is required for any pull request which modifies:

  • The structure or layout of the release artifacts.
  • The evaluation performance (memory, execution time) of an existing query.
  • The results of an existing query in any circumstance.

If you are only adding new rule queries, a change note is not required.

Author: Is a change note required?

  • Yes
  • No

🚨🚨🚨
Reviewer: Confirm that format of shared queries (not the .qll file, the
.ql file that imports it) is valid by running them within VS Code.

  • Confirmed

Reviewer: Confirm that either a change note is not required or the change note is required and has been added.

  • Confirmed

Query development review checklist

For PRs that add new queries or modify existing queries, the following checklist should be completed by both the author and reviewer:

Author

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

Reviewer

  • Have all the relevant rule package description files been checked in?
  • Have you verified that the metadata properties of each new query is set appropriately?
  • Do all the unit tests contain both "COMPLIANT" and "NON_COMPLIANT" cases?
  • Are the alert messages properly formatted and consistent with the style guide?
  • Have you run the queries on OpenPilot and verified that the performance and results are acceptable?
    As a rule of thumb, predicates specific to the query should take no more than 1 minute, and for simple queries be under 10 seconds. If this is not the case, this should be highlighted and agreed in the code review process.
  • Does the query have an appropriate level of in-query comments/documentation?
  • Have you considered/identified possible edge cases?
  • Does the query not reinvent features in the standard library?
  • Can the query be simplified further (not golfed!)

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings March 12, 2025 05:18

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR implements the final amendments for MISRA C 2023 by updating change notes for several CodeQL queries.

  • Updated change notes for DIR-4-9, clarifying that macros with _Generic are no longer reported
  • Updated change notes for RULE-1-4, indicating the ban on usage of _Generics has been removed
  • Added change notes for new query RULE-18-6 detecting thread local objects assigned to static storage duration objects, and updated notes for RULE-21-12 to report usage of certain functions in "fenv.h"

Tip: Copilot code review supports C#, Go, Java, JavaScript, Markdown, Python, Ruby and TypeScript, with more languages coming soon. Learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant