Modify social icons to latest branding

[taysea]

Update social icons to latest branding. Pointing this to "NEXT" branch to stage for next major release.

Tested locally in storybook:

[halocline]

Just thinking about timing. Do these make sense to be released in a minor version? How long will it be until we are ready to publish a major version? Seems like there are external dependencies which affect the major version timing? Should we ship these sooner?

[halocline]

How does "Mail" fit the "social icon" theme? Less about a brand and more about the sharing mechanism?

[taysea]

Good call, it does have a specific color on it when I do plain -- so let me confirm with Chris if it was a specific app/company.

If it's just generic, I'd opt for it not having a specified HEX color and not be considered part of this "social icon" set.

[taysea]

I connected with Chris. That "Mail" option is one we have for brand to use alongside other social icons in a "share to" kind of scenario. It is not a specific company icon, so from an open-source standpoint it doesn't necessarily make sense to be grouped with this.

It seems in some of his future revisions for icons, he's exploring a "filled" version of some of the icons so that might make more sense.

Given that discussion, I'm going to remove the modification to this icon for now.

[taysea]

Just thinking about timing. Do these make sense to be released in a minor version? How long will it be until we are ready to publish a major version? Seems like there are external dependencies which affect the major version timing? Should we ship these sooner?

Wasn't sure if shipping these in a minor version would break backwards compatibility semantic versioning rules. It's kind of a blurry line in the sense that they are modified and look different than old logos, but also it's just keeping up to date with external brands and it doesn't feel like we should have to major release each time some other brand changes its logo.

Talking myself into including these in a minor release, but what do you think @halocline @jcfilben

[jcfilben]

Wasn't sure if shipping these in a minor version would break backwards compatibility semantic versioning rules. It's kind > of a blurry line in the sense that they are modified and look different than old logos, but also it's just keeping up to date > with external brands and it doesn't feel like we should have to major release each time some other brand changes its logo.

Talking myself into including these in a minor release, but what do you think @halocline @jcfilben

I'm comfortable with considering these updates as a minor release

[halocline]

Wasn't sure if shipping these in a minor version would break backwards compatibility semantic versioning rules. It's kind > of a blurry line in the sense that they are modified and look different than old logos, but also it's just keeping up to date > with external brands and it doesn't feel like we should have to major release each time some other brand changes its logo.
Talking myself into including these in a minor release, but what do you think @halocline @jcfilben

I'm comfortable with considering these updates as a minor release

My thinking is:

• Functionality is still intact.
• Part of the icon "service" is to stay up to date with brands. Adjusting the brand's icon is simply passing through something the brand executed. This is different than altering the style for how icons are drawn in general.

So, I'd be okay with the minor.

[taysea]

Great, have updated the base branch to master.

[jcfilben]

Looks good!