Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with Spring Security #145

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2020
Merged

Compatibility with Spring Security #145

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2020

Conversation

jglick
Copy link
Member

@jglick jglick commented Sep 1, 2020

To work with jenkinsci/jenkins#4848.

jglick added a commit to jglick/jep that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2020
@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Sep 1, 2020

Seems tests are flaky on Windows like in https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/parameterized-trigger-plugin/job/master/26/testReport/hudson.plugins.parameterizedtrigger.test/FileBuildTriggerConfigTest/windows_8___Build__windows_8____testMatrixBuildsOnOtherNodes/ or https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/parameterized-trigger-plugin/job/master/30/testReport/hudson.plugins.parameterizedtrigger.test/NodeParametersTest/windows_8___Build__windows_8____testQueuedJobsNotCombined/ or now https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Plugins/job/parameterized-trigger-plugin/job/PR-145/2/testReport/hudson.plugins.parameterizedtrigger.test/NodeParametersTest/windows_8___Build__windows_8____testQueuedJobsNotCombined/ because of a Remoting problem:

  65.390 [id=3729]	INFO	h.r.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread#run: I/O error in channel slave2
java.io.IOException: Unexpected EOF
	at hudson.remoting.ChunkedInputStream.readUntilBreak(ChunkedInputStream.java:99)
	at hudson.remoting.ChunkedCommandTransport.readBlock(ChunkedCommandTransport.java:39)
	at hudson.remoting.AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.read(AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.java:35)
	at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:63)
  65.417 [id=3718]	WARNING	h.r.RemoteInvocationHandler$Unexporter#run: Couldn't clean up oid=2 from null
java.io.IOException: The pipe is being closed
	at java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
	at java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:326)
	at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:82)
	at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:140)
	at hudson.remoting.ChunkedOutputStream.sendBreak(ChunkedOutputStream.java:63)
	at hudson.remoting.ChunkedCommandTransport.writeBlock(ChunkedCommandTransport.java:46)
	at hudson.remoting.AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.write(AbstractSynchronousByteArrayCommandTransport.java:47)
	at hudson.remoting.Channel.send(Channel.java:723)
	at hudson.remoting.RemoteInvocationHandler$PhantomReferenceImpl.cleanup(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:393)
	at hudson.remoting.RemoteInvocationHandler$PhantomReferenceImpl.access$1000(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:352)
	at hudson.remoting.RemoteInvocationHandler$Unexporter.run(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:610)
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
	at hudson.remoting.AtmostOneThreadExecutor$Worker.run(AtmostOneThreadExecutor.java:112)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

@jglick jglick closed this Sep 1, 2020
@jglick jglick reopened this Sep 1, 2020
@jglick jglick requested a review from olamy September 1, 2020 20:49
@jglick
Copy link
Member Author

jglick commented Sep 1, 2020

Windows builds flake on GitHub Actions, too…

@olamy olamy merged commit 371f01b into jenkinsci:master Sep 5, 2020
rtyler pushed a commit to jglick/jep that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2020
@jglick jglick deleted the spring branch September 8, 2020 17:38
jglick added a commit to jglick/jep that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants